Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1415939
| From | Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider argument order" |
| Date | 2016-06-07 11:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rHlEm-Wz-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rHe9Q-4nr-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2016-06-07 03:38, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote: > Hi > > I recently noticed that alternating between "make" and "make targz-pkg" > rebuilds the whole Kernel. This was not happening before. As a Kernel > developer, my build/install/test environment heavily relies on the fact > that "make targz-pkg" only quickly generates the tarball if everything > is already built, so this change is heavily impacting my development > environment. > > I did some bisection and concluded that the first bad commit is: > > commit 9c8fa9bc08f60ac657751daba9fccf828a36cfed > Author: Masahiro Yamada > Date: Sat May 7 15:48:26 2016 +0900 > kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider argument order > > I also verified that if I just revert this commit on top of the > most recent tree it goes back to the usual behavior. > > I read the commit message and it seems that some unneeded rebuilds are > somewhat expected, but I can't understand why such a change in the > command line like the one I did triggers everything to be rebuilt. > IMHO, it really shouldn't. I also wonder that maybe the regression I'm > experiencing was not expected in the original change, so maybe there's > a way to keep the original improvement caused by the mentioned patch > without the regression I'm experiencing. > > How to reproduce (exact commands I used at every bisect step): > > $ make tinyconfig > $ time make -j4 V=2 # this should build things > $ time make -j4 V=2 # just to make sure nothing will be rebuilt > $ time make -j4 V=2 targz-pkg I can reproduce it. Michal
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider argument order" "Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> - 2016-06-07 03:40 +0200
Re: Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider argument order" Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> - 2016-06-07 11:40 +0200
Re: Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider argument order" Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> - 2016-06-07 12:00 +0200
Re: Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider argument order" Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2016-06-07 12:10 +0200
Re: Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider argument order" Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> - 2016-06-07 12:50 +0200
Re: Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider argument order" Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2016-06-07 13:40 +0200
Re: Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider argument order" "Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> - 2016-06-07 16:20 +0200
Re: Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider argument order" Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> - 2016-06-08 00:00 +0200
Re: Regression in "kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider argument order" "Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> - 2016-06-09 01:30 +0200
csiph-web