Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1409271
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] fs/namei.c: Improve dcache hash function |
| Date | 2016-05-30 18:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rEyeJ-6B4-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rEx91-5Uj-47@gated-at.bofh.it> <rExVo-6ui-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:06:18PM -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> Not quite. The fold_hash() you quote is used only on 64-bit systems,
> which can be assumed to have a reasonable 64-bit multiply. On 32-bit
> platforms, I avoid using GOLDEN_RATIO_64 at all, since 64x64-bit
> multiplies are so expensive.
Right; as stated performance really isn't a goal here.
> You actually have only 96 bits of input. The correct prototype is:
>
> static inline u64 iterate_chain_key(u64 key, u32 idx)
Indeed, although I conveniently ignored that because I didn't think it'd
matter :-)
> If performance mattered, I'd be inclined to use one or two iterations
> of the 32-bit HASH_MIX() function, which is specifically designed
> to add 32 bits to a 64-bit hash value.
Ah, I missed that HASH_MIX() had 64 bit state, so much for being able to
read it seems. Also; should we not move that entire section of
fs/namei.c into linux/hash.h ?
These two primitives seem generally useful.
> A more thorough mixing would be achieved by __jhash_mix(). Basically:
>
> static inline u64 iterate_chain_key(u64 key, u32 idx)
> {
> u32 k0 = key, k1 = key >> 32;
>
> __jhash_mix(idx, k0, k1) /* Macro that modifies arguments! */
>
> return k0 | (u64)k1 << 32;
> }
>
> (The order of arguments is chosen to perserve the two "most-hashed" values.)
(I'd never have managed to deduce that property given the information in
jhash.h)
OK, that looks good to me, thanks! I'll go use that then.
> Also, I just had contact from the hppa folks who have brought to my
> attention that it's an example of an out-of-order superscalar CPU that
> *doesn't* have a good integer multiplier. For general multiplies,
> you have to move values to the FPU and the code is a pain.
Egads, that's horrible, but sounds exactly like the thing you 'like'
given these patches :-) Good luck with that.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 00/10] String hash improvements "George Spelvin" <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-25 09:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/10] String hash improvements Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-05-25 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/10] String hash improvements "George Spelvin" <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-25 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/10] String hash improvements Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-05-25 11:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/10] String hash improvements "George Spelvin" <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-25 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/10] String hash improvements Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-05-25 18:10 +0200
[PATCH v3 01/10] Pull out string hash to <linux/stringhash.h> George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-28 22:00 +0200
[PATCH v3 04/10] Change hash_64() return value to 32 bits George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-28 22:00 +0200
[PATCH v3 03/10] <linux/sunrpc/svcauth.h>: Define hash_str() in terms of hashlen_string() George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-28 22:00 +0200
[PATCH v3 10/10] h8300: Add <asm/hash.h> George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-28 22:00 +0200
[PATCH v3 07/10] <linux/hash.h>: Add support for architecture-specific functions George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-28 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] <linux/hash.h>: Add support for architecture-specific functions Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-05-29 10:00 +0200
[PATCH v3 00/10] String hash improvements George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-28 22:00 +0200
[PATCH v3 05/10] Eliminate bad hash multipliers from hash_32() and hash_64() George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-28 22:00 +0200
[PATCH v3 09/10] microblaze: Add <asm/hash.h> George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-28 22:00 +0200
[PATCH v3 08/10] m68k: Add <asm/hash.h> George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-28 22:00 +0200
[PATCH v3 06/10] fs/namei.c: Improve dcache hash function George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-28 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] fs/namei.c: Improve dcache hash function Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-30 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] fs/namei.c: Improve dcache hash function "George Spelvin" <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-30 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] fs/namei.c: Improve dcache hash function Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-30 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] fs/namei.c: Improve dcache hash function "George Spelvin" <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-30 20:20 +0200
[PATCH v3 02/10] fs/namei.c: Add hashlen_string() function George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-28 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] String hash improvements Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-05-28 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] String hash improvements "George Spelvin" <linux@sciencehorizons.net> - 2016-05-28 23:00 +0200
[PATCH v2 00/10] String hash improvements "George Spelvin" <linux@horizon.com> - 2016-05-27 17:00 +0200
csiph-web