Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1343141

Re: [PATCH] [Cleanup] x86: signal: unify the sigaltstack check with other arches

From Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] [Cleanup] x86: signal: unify the sigaltstack check with other arches
Date 2016-02-25 13:20 +0100
Message-ID <r633H-3FK-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r4Liy-4Uy-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <r5Zt8-120-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


25.02.2016 11:25, Ingo Molnar пишет:
> 
> * Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> wrote:
> 
>> Currently x86's get_sigframe() checks for "current->sas_ss_size"
>> to determine whether there is a need to switch to sigaltstack.
>> The common practice used by all other arches is to check for
>> sas_ss_flags(sp) == 0
>>
>> This patch makes the code consistent with other arches.
>> The slight complexity of the patch is added by the optimization on
>> !sigstack check that was requested by Andy Lutomirski: sas_ss_flags(sp)==0
>> already implies that we are not on a sigstack, so the code is shuffled
>> to avoid the duplicate checking.
> 
> So this changelog is missing an analysis about what effect this change will have 
> on applications. Can any type of user-space code see a change in behavior? If yes, 
> what will happen and is that effect desirable?
This is a clean-up, and as such, there is no visible effect.
If there is - it is a bug.
The purpose of this patch is only to unify the x86 code with
what all the other arches do. It was initially the part of the
rejected series, but now it is just a clean-up.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH] [Cleanup] x86: signal: unify the sigaltstack check with  other arches Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-02-25 09:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] [Cleanup] x86: signal: unify the sigaltstack check with  other arches Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2016-02-25 13:20 +0100

csiph-web