Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1329658

Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] dts: ipq4019: Add support for IPQ4019 DK01 board

From Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] dts: ipq4019: Add support for IPQ4019 DK01 board
Date 2016-02-08 23:50 +0100
Message-ID <r02N3-39K-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qwGEF-7yE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwGOm-7Dg-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 11/19, Matthew McClintock wrote:
> +
> +/ {
> +	model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ4019/AP-DK01.1";
> +	compatible = "qcom,ipq4019";
> +
> +	clocks {
> +                xo: xo {
> +                        compatible = "fixed-clock";
> +                        clock-frequency = <48000000>;
> +                        #clock-cells = <0>;
> +                };
> +	};

Is there a reason the xo is here and the sleep clk is in the SoC
dtsi file? Both are board clocks so I would think they would be
added in the same place.

> +
> +	soc {
> +
> +
> +		timer {
> +			compatible = "arm,armv7-timer";
> +			interrupts = <1 2 0xf08>,
> +				     <1 3 0xf08>,
> +				     <1 4 0xf08>,
> +				     <1 1 0xf08>;
> +			clock-frequency = <48000000>;
> +		};

The timer shouldn't be part of the SoC node (it has no reg property).

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] dts: ipq4019: Add support for IPQ4019 DK01 board Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-02-08 23:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] dts: ipq4019: Add support for IPQ4019 DK01 board Matthew McClintock <mmcclint@codeaurora.org> - 2016-02-16 21:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] dts: ipq4019: Add support for IPQ4019 DK01 board Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-02-19 03:50 +0100

csiph-web