Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1335827
| From | Matthew McClintock <mmcclint@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] dts: ipq4019: Add support for IPQ4019 DK01 board |
| Date | 2016-02-16 21:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r2UJk-4va-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qwGEF-7yE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwGOm-7Dg-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <r02N3-39K-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Feb 8, 2016, at 4:43 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> On 11/19, Matthew McClintock wrote:
>> +
>> +/ {
>> + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ4019/AP-DK01.1";
>> + compatible = "qcom,ipq4019";
>> +
>> + clocks {
>> + xo: xo {
>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> + clock-frequency = <48000000>;
>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> + };
>
> Is there a reason the xo is here and the sleep clk is in the SoC
> dtsi file? Both are board clocks so I would think they would be
> added in the same place.
I’m a little bit confused and I wanted to confirm. I can see the xo clock is on the board itself. However, the sleep_clk is not, can you clarify why they would both be in the same place?
-M
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] dts: ipq4019: Add support for IPQ4019 DK01 board Matthew McClintock <mmcclint@codeaurora.org> - 2016-02-16 21:50 +0100 Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] dts: ipq4019: Add support for IPQ4019 DK01 board Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-02-19 03:50 +0100
csiph-web