Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1335827

Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] dts: ipq4019: Add support for IPQ4019 DK01 board

From Matthew McClintock <mmcclint@codeaurora.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] dts: ipq4019: Add support for IPQ4019 DK01 board
Date 2016-02-16 21:50 +0100
Message-ID <r2UJk-4va-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qwGEF-7yE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwGOm-7Dg-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <r02N3-39K-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Feb 8, 2016, at 4:43 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> 
> On 11/19, Matthew McClintock wrote:
>> +
>> +/ {
>> +	model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ4019/AP-DK01.1";
>> +	compatible = "qcom,ipq4019";
>> +
>> +	clocks {
>> +                xo: xo {
>> +                        compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> +                        clock-frequency = <48000000>;
>> +                        #clock-cells = <0>;
>> +                };
>> +	};
> 
> Is there a reason the xo is here and the sleep clk is in the SoC
> dtsi file? Both are board clocks so I would think they would be
> added in the same place.

I’m a little bit confused and I wanted to confirm. I can see the xo clock is on the board itself. However, the sleep_clk is not, can you clarify why they would both be in the same place?

-M

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] dts: ipq4019: Add support for IPQ4019 DK01 board Matthew McClintock <mmcclint@codeaurora.org> - 2016-02-16 21:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] dts: ipq4019: Add support for IPQ4019 DK01 board Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-02-19 03:50 +0100

csiph-web