Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1275387
| From | Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: dwarf unwinder question |
| Date | 2015-11-23 14:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qxZlW-2hK-71@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qxZ2y-29g-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qxZcf-2dc-47@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Monday 23 November 2015 06:45 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 23.11.15 at 14:03, <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> wrote: >> I was wondering if u could answer a question in that respect: >> arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c >> >> If the binary search for a PC fails, it resorts to linear search, which for >> our >> case was taking 3 million cycles (vs. normal ~2000). >> Do you remember why this linear search step was needed - after all the binary >> lookup table is created out of early parsing of the same data. >> >> The fail scenario is for hand asm symbols lacking gcc generated dwarf info >> and we >> don't have yet the CFI pseudo ops support in assembler. >> I can fix memset etc to have empty dwarf info, still unwinder needs this >> fixing. >> >> In case of perf, an overflow interrupt in hand optimized memset leads into >> the >> unwinder slow path linear search which causes RCU stalls and such. >> I'm going to remove it but was wondering if u could provide some historic >> background. > Iirc there was no binary lookup at all originally. When it got added, > it seemed odd to remove the linear lookup altogether (want to keep > it at least for the case where the binary lookup table couldn't be > built for whatever reason), and code structure seemed most > reasonable to simply do one after the other instead of just either. > I'm pretty sure the linear lookup could be skipped if you're sure the > binary lookup table is correct and complete. > > Jan Thx for quick reply. I'll remove the linear search as part of many other tweaks to speed it up - we can elide a lot of general dwarf checks / rechecks - given that it is used only for kernel unwinding (not user space). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
dwarf unwinder question Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2015-11-23 14:10 +0100
Re: dwarf unwinder question "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2015-11-23 14:20 +0100
Re: dwarf unwinder question Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2015-11-23 14:30 +0100
Re: dwarf unwinder question "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2015-11-23 14:50 +0100
csiph-web