Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1275404
| From | "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: dwarf unwinder question |
| Date | 2015-11-23 14:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qxZFh-2qN-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qxZ2y-29g-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qxZcf-2dc-47@gated-at.bofh.it> <qxZlW-2hK-71@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
>>> On 23.11.15 at 14:27, <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> wrote: > On Monday 23 November 2015 06:45 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 23.11.15 at 14:03, <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> wrote: >>> I was wondering if u could answer a question in that respect: >>> arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c >>> >>> If the binary search for a PC fails, it resorts to linear search, which for >>> our >>> case was taking 3 million cycles (vs. normal ~2000). >>> Do you remember why this linear search step was needed - after all the binary >>> lookup table is created out of early parsing of the same data. >>> >>> The fail scenario is for hand asm symbols lacking gcc generated dwarf info >>> and we >>> don't have yet the CFI pseudo ops support in assembler. >>> I can fix memset etc to have empty dwarf info, still unwinder needs this >>> fixing. >>> >>> In case of perf, an overflow interrupt in hand optimized memset leads into >>> the >>> unwinder slow path linear search which causes RCU stalls and such. >>> I'm going to remove it but was wondering if u could provide some historic >>> background. >> Iirc there was no binary lookup at all originally. When it got added, >> it seemed odd to remove the linear lookup altogether (want to keep >> it at least for the case where the binary lookup table couldn't be >> built for whatever reason), and code structure seemed most >> reasonable to simply do one after the other instead of just either. >> I'm pretty sure the linear lookup could be skipped if you're sure the >> binary lookup table is correct and complete. > > Thx for quick reply. I'll remove the linear search as part of many other > tweaks to > speed it up - we can elide a lot of general dwarf checks / rechecks - given > that > it is used only for kernel unwinding (not user space). Don't tell Linus if you're removing any checks... Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
dwarf unwinder question Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2015-11-23 14:10 +0100
Re: dwarf unwinder question "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2015-11-23 14:20 +0100
Re: dwarf unwinder question Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2015-11-23 14:30 +0100
Re: dwarf unwinder question "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2015-11-23 14:50 +0100
csiph-web