Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1265752
| From | Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: kdbus refactoring? |
| Date | 2015-11-09 16:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qsWf0-866-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <qsQjf-42K-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsQsW-465-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsQMi-4tx-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsQMi-4tx-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsQVY-4xo-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:28:42AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 09.11.2015 um 10:19 schrieb David Herrmann: > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:56:04AM +0100, David Herrmann wrote: > >> > >>> The submission and following year of development followed the 'kernel > >>> way'. > >> > >> This is not true; the last complete posting I could find was: > >> > >> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:09:06 +0100 > >> Subject: [PATCH v4 00/14] Add kdbus implementation > > > > ..which was the last time we proposed it for inclusion. > > Guys, let's cool down. :-) > > What Peter is complaining about is that since the last proposal a lot > of iterative patches and even pull requests were sent instead of > complete patch series. > The expectation was that you send patch series with fixes folded in > as long the review takes. And that will happen, when the code is ready, nothing different is happening here from any other code submission. I don't know why people somehow think we don't know how to do this whole thing, it's as if they don't trust us, which is sad. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
kdbus refactoring? Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 22:10 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 22:40 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-11-09 00:40 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2015-11-09 02:00 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2015-11-09 09:40 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 09:40 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-11-09 09:50 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 10:00 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-11-09 10:10 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 10:20 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2015-11-09 10:30 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-11-09 16:10 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2015-11-09 17:00 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-11-09 10:20 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 09:20 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-11-09 18:00 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-11-09 18:10 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2015-11-09 18:20 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-11-09 18:30 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? "Kalle A. Sandstrom" <ksandstr@iki.fi> - 2015-11-12 06:50 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2015-11-09 18:10 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-11-08 22:40 +0100
csiph-web