Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1265457
| From | David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: kdbus refactoring? |
| Date | 2015-11-09 10:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qsQsW-465-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <qsFQR-5wX-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsHJ1-6PP-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsIYp-7xq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsQ9z-3Zi-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qsQjf-42K-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:34:37AM +0100, David Herrmann wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:53 AM, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> wrote: >> > Quoting Documentation/development-process/1.Intro: >> [...] >> >> Years of experience with the kernel development community have taught a >> >> clear lesson: kernel code which is designed and developed behind closed >> >> doors invariably has problems which are only revealed when the code is >> >> released into the community. Sometimes these problems are severe, >> >> requiring months or years of effort before the code can be brought up to >> >> the kernel community's standards. >> [...] >> > And I've seen you specifically recommend having such conversations early >> > and often. >> >> I think comparing kdbus to "behind closed doors" development models is >> unfair. We chose to center our development around DBus, not the >> kernel. > > And yet it will be the kernel people you ask to take your code. You > don't see something funny with that? No. >> Anybody who is interested in kdbus discussions could have >> easily joined the DBus and systemd communication channels (and *many* >> people did). I see little reason in cross-posting everything to LKML, >> especially given that our communication is rarely mail-based. > > So you want to develop kernel code, but can't be arsed to do it the > kernel way? Gheez, no wonder this all is going so well.. The submission and following year of development followed the 'kernel way'. I don't see why the design phase needs to follow your style, though. Thanks David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
kdbus refactoring? Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 22:10 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 22:40 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-11-09 00:40 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2015-11-09 02:00 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2015-11-09 09:40 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 09:40 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-11-09 09:50 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 10:00 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-11-09 10:10 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 10:20 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2015-11-09 10:30 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-11-09 16:10 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2015-11-09 17:00 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-11-09 10:20 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 09:20 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-11-09 18:00 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-11-09 18:10 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2015-11-09 18:20 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-11-09 18:30 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? "Kalle A. Sandstrom" <ksandstr@iki.fi> - 2015-11-12 06:50 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> - 2015-11-09 18:10 +0100
Re: kdbus refactoring? Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-11-08 22:40 +0100
csiph-web