Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1264004
| From | Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: GPU-DRM-i915: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "pwm_put" |
| Date | 2015-11-06 14:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qrP5U-4Zf-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <mSsDN-4wa-65@gated-at.bofh.it> <mSsDN-4wa-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrOCS-4yt-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrOCS-4yt-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qrOMx-4BZ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo |
On Fri, 06 Nov 2015, SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: >>> The pwm_put() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then >>> returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed. >> >> The compiler doesn't need it, but IMO it's useful documentation for humans. > > How do you think about to extend the explicit documentation for > the affected parameters in the Linux programming interfaces? The question is, while reading intel_panel.c, which one conveys the reader better the idea that panel->backlight.pwm may be NULL for some connectors: a) if (panel->backlight.pwm) pwm_put(panel->backlight.pwm); b) pwm_put(panel->backlight.pwm); No amount of documentation in pwm_put() kernel-doc is going to help with that. In most cases, panel->backlight.pwm is in fact NULL. IMO unconditionally calling pwm_put() on it gives the reader the wrong idea. Others may disagree. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] GPU-DRM-i915: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "pwm_put" Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> - 2015-11-06 13:50 +0100
Re: GPU-DRM-i915: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "pwm_put" SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-11-06 14:00 +0100
Re: GPU-DRM-i915: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "pwm_put" Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> - 2015-11-06 14:20 +0100
csiph-web