Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1259145

Re: [PATCH v3] Input: tsc2005 - Add support for tsc2004

From Michael Welling <mwelling@ieee.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3] Input: tsc2005 - Add support for tsc2004
Date 2015-10-30 02:10 +0100
Message-ID <qp6mC-7GR-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <qoWng-1hg-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qp3f4-5BD-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qp3oK-5ES-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qp3RM-64M-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qp5Tz-7i3-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:39:05AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 03:23:31PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> 
> > However, you have regmap in the driver core already. Mark, is it
> > possible to have regmap API also allow doing raw underlying protocol
> > transfer so that consumers could issue command requests without needing
> > to know if they need to do it over i2c or spi or whatever. Or we need a
> > notion of command registers in regmap...
> 
> I don't think it's a good idea to break the encapsulation of the regmap
> and export the raw I/O functionality directly, there seem to be more bad
> ways of using that than good.  The driver must at some point know what
> bus it is dealing with and be able to manage this itself.
> 
> I don't know what "command registers" are.

With this device, if the MSB of the first byte of the transaction is 1 then
a convertor command is encoded in that byte instead of a register address.

So here is my plan:
- Add a function pointer for tsc2005_cmd in the struct tsc2005
- Put the spi and i2c tsc2005_cmd versions in their respective drivers
- Pass the cmd functions to the core via tsc200x_probe

Any objections?
Other review suggestions before I code the revision?
Am I doing too much with a single patch?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v3] Input: tsc2005 - Add support for tsc2004 kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2015-10-29 08:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v3] Input: tsc2005 - Add support for tsc2004 Michael Welling <mwelling@ieee.org> - 2015-10-29 15:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3] Input: tsc2005 - Add support for tsc2004 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-29 22:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3] Input: tsc2005 - Add support for tsc2004 Michael Welling <mwelling@ieee.org> - 2015-10-29 23:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v3] Input: tsc2005 - Add support for tsc2004 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 23:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v3] Input: tsc2005 - Add support for tsc2004 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-10-30 01:40 +0100
            Re: [PATCH v3] Input: tsc2005 - Add support for tsc2004 Michael Welling <mwelling@ieee.org> - 2015-10-30 02:10 +0100
              Re: [PATCH v3] Input: tsc2005 - Add support for tsc2004 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-30 11:50 +0100

csiph-web