Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1252707

Re: console vs earlycon ?

Show all headers | View raw

On Wednesday 21 October 2015 18:30:05 Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> >> I am trying to implement OF_EARLYCON_DECLARE() for that.
> >>
> >> I was just wondering if console_initcall() should work as well.
> >>
> >>
> >> As I said, I noticed the console_initcall() in 8250_core.c
> >> only works on very limited platforms.
> >
> > It works with all those that use of_serial.c, right?
> 
> I doubt it.
> 
> 
> I have a board with a pure 8250-compat device working.
> (  compatible = "ns16550a")
> It uses of_serial.c, of course.
> 
> 
> As far as I tested, it would never enable the console at console_init().

Ok, that sounds like a bug. Peter and others have changed that code
a lot in the last year. I wonder if this has never worked then or
if it has regressed.

> The console is enabled when the UART driver is probed.
> (or earlycon if "earlycon" is specified in the kernel-parameter.)

Got it. Let me know if you think this interpretation is correct:

* univ8250_console_match() looks for the earlycon argument format like
  "console=uart[8250],io|mmio|mmio32,<addr>[,<options>]", and that
  would work, but we don't want to have to pass all that data when
  the information should already be there.

* univ8250_console_setup() looks for ports that have been added by
  one of several other methods (including earlycon) already, but
  we don't do that on ARM without earlycon being enabled.

* arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c does everything we need, but
  does not live in architecture independent code and does a few
  things that we probably don't need or want there. It relies
  on scanning the device tree for known UART device nodes before
  the platform devices are added.

* for console_initcall() to do the right thing, we want both the
  ttyS devices to get added early for console=ttyS1 to work, as well
  as having the preferred console work based on the stdout-property.

* we parse the /chosen/stdout-path property in drivers/of/base and
  store the device node pointer in the global 'of_stdout' variable,
  but do not use it until the uart is added by the tty driver
  and calls of_console_check() to add the default console device.
 
	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

console vs earlycon ? Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2015-10-21 10:30 +0200
  Re: console vs earlycon ? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-21 11:00 +0200
    Re: console vs earlycon ? Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2015-10-21 11:10 +0200
      Re: console vs earlycon ? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-21 11:30 +0200
        Re: console vs earlycon ? Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2015-10-21 11:40 +0200
          Re: console vs earlycon ? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-21 12:40 +0200
            Re: console vs earlycon ? Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2015-10-21 16:00 +0200
              Re: console vs earlycon ? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-21 16:20 +0200
                Re: console vs earlycon ? Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2015-10-21 17:40 +0200
                Re: console vs earlycon ? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-21 21:10 +0200
                Re: console vs earlycon ? Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2015-10-21 21:30 +0200
                Re: console vs earlycon ? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-22 01:00 +0200
  Re: console vs earlycon ? Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2015-10-21 15:30 +0200
    Re: console vs earlycon ? Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2015-10-22 06:50 +0200

csiph-web