Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1252852
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: console vs earlycon ? |
| Date | 2015-10-21 16:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qm2pc-5pS-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qlWWu-5OT-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qlYYi-hR-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qm25Q-4NY-39@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wednesday 21 October 2015 09:53:47 Peter Hurley wrote: > On 10/21/2015 06:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 21 October 2015 18:30:05 Masahiro Yamada wrote: > >>> > >>>> I am trying to implement OF_EARLYCON_DECLARE() for that. > >>>> > >>>> I was just wondering if console_initcall() should work as well. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> As I said, I noticed the console_initcall() in 8250_core.c > >>>> only works on very limited platforms. > >>> > >>> It works with all those that use of_serial.c, right? > >> > >> I doubt it. > >> > >> > >> I have a board with a pure 8250-compat device working. > >> ( compatible = "ns16550a") > >> It uses of_serial.c, of course. > >> > >> > >> As far as I tested, it would never enable the console at console_init(). > > > > Ok, that sounds like a bug. Peter and others have changed that code > > a lot in the last year. I wonder if this has never worked then or > > if it has regressed. > > No, not a bug. console_init() is only for legacy platforms, not for > probed drivers. Ah, I had no idea we were moving in this direction. So I guess the idea is not to add another for_each_compatible_node() loop when we already have two places (earlycon and tty) in the code that do this? > > * arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c does everything we need, but > > does not live in architecture independent code and does a few > > things that we probably don't need or want there. It relies > > on scanning the device tree for known UART device nodes before > > the platform devices are added. > > > > * for console_initcall() to do the right thing, we want both the > > ttyS devices to get added early for console=ttyS1 to work, as well > > as having the preferred console work based on the stdout-property. > > > > * we parse the /chosen/stdout-path property in drivers/of/base and > > store the device node pointer in the global 'of_stdout' variable, > > but do not use it until the uart is added by the tty driver > > and calls of_console_check() to add the default console device. > > I'm assuming the issue with trying to get console_init() working > is because the dummy color console causes the earlycon to be disabled? I don't think so. My line of thinking was more about usability: earlycon requires that you edit the kernel command line at the moment, while console_init() doesn't require any user interaction and just uses the stdout-path. I guess we could enable earlycon using a Kconfig symbol if we want to, or make it a per-architecture decision whether it's enabled even in the absence of the command line flag. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
console vs earlycon ? Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2015-10-21 10:30 +0200
Re: console vs earlycon ? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-21 11:00 +0200
Re: console vs earlycon ? Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2015-10-21 11:10 +0200
Re: console vs earlycon ? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-21 11:30 +0200
Re: console vs earlycon ? Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2015-10-21 11:40 +0200
Re: console vs earlycon ? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-21 12:40 +0200
Re: console vs earlycon ? Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2015-10-21 16:00 +0200
Re: console vs earlycon ? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-21 16:20 +0200
Re: console vs earlycon ? Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2015-10-21 17:40 +0200
Re: console vs earlycon ? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-21 21:10 +0200
Re: console vs earlycon ? Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2015-10-21 21:30 +0200
Re: console vs earlycon ? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-22 01:00 +0200
Re: console vs earlycon ? Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2015-10-21 15:30 +0200
Re: console vs earlycon ? Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2015-10-22 06:50 +0200
csiph-web