Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function

From	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function
Date	2015-10-14 16:00 +0200
Message-ID	<qjuL0-k6-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <qjpBE-1hT-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjrtM-40U-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjs6u-52j-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjtvA-70U-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjuBl-8B-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 03:47:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> ---
>  Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt b/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt
> index 5001280e9d82..e8e9ad4e6f5e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.txt
> @@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ a lock-class is used for the first time after bootup it gets registered,
>  and all subsequent uses of that lock-class will be attached to this
>  lock-class.
>  
> +A class is typically associated with a lock's initialisation site; although
> +its possible to explicitly initialize a lock with a different class key --
> +such class keys much come from static storage.

Now if only I could actually type: s/much/must/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Thread

Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-13 22:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-13 23:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-14 10:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-14 10:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-14 11:10 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-14 11:10 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-10-14 12:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-10-14 12:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-14 13:10 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-10-14 14:40 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-14 15:50 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-14 16:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-10-14 16:00 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-10-14 16:20 +0200

csiph-web