Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1246479

Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function

From Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function
Date 2015-10-14 12:10 +0200
Message-ID <qjraq-3DR-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qjewy-LU-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjpBE-1hT-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjpLl-1t1-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjqem-2hl-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qjqen-2hl-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:08:15AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:00:20AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 October 2015 10:37:07 Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > but apparently this is work-in-progress and the plan is to use it
> > in 4.4 when the rest of the currently-under-review patches are merged.

> And here I thought we had a fairly strong rule that we should not merge
> unused code :/

The revisions are very minor (and are sitting in my inbox for me to
look at just now), and keeping things out of tree just makes it more
difficult to get them merged - it's one thing if things are getting in
the way for a long time or have a high cost but that's not the case
here.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-13 22:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-13 23:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-14 10:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-14 10:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-10-14 11:10 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-14 11:10 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-10-14 12:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-10-14 12:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-14 13:10 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-10-14 14:40 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-14 15:50 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-10-14 16:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-10-14 16:00 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-10-14 16:20 +0200

csiph-web