Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1242556

Re: [PATCH 2/5] irqchip/gic-v3: Make gic_enable_sre an inline function

From Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 2/5] irqchip/gic-v3: Make gic_enable_sre an inline function
Date 2015-10-08 18:00 +0200
Message-ID <qhlLP-81t-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qfbxf-od-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qfbxf-od-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:37:51PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> +static inline bool gic_enable_sre(void)
> +{
> +	u64 val;
> +
> +	asm volatile("mrs_s %0, " __stringify(ICC_SRE_EL1) : "=r" (val));
> +	if (val & ICC_SRE_EL1_SRE)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	val |= ICC_SRE_EL1_SRE;
> +	asm volatile("msr_s " __stringify(ICC_SRE_EL1) ", %0" : : "r" (val));
> +	isb();
> +	asm volatile("mrs_s %0, " __stringify(ICC_SRE_EL1) : "=r" (val));
> +
> +	return !!(val & ICC_SRE_EL1_SRE);
> +}

I don't think !! is needed ;). Apparently, from ISO C99: "When any
scalar value is converted to _Bool, the result is 0 if the value
compares equal to 0; otherwise, the result is 1."

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 2/5] irqchip/gic-v3: Make gic_enable_sre an inline  function Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2015-10-08 18:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 2/5] irqchip/gic-v3: Make gic_enable_sre an inline function Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2015-10-08 18:10 +0200

csiph-web