Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1242556 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-08 18:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-10-08 18:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 2/5] irqchip/gic-v3: Make gic_enable_sre an inline function Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2015-10-08 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/5] irqchip/gic-v3: Make gic_enable_sre an inline function Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2015-10-08 18:10 +0200
| From | Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 18:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/5] irqchip/gic-v3: Make gic_enable_sre an inline function |
| Message-ID | <qhlLP-81t-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:37:51PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> +static inline bool gic_enable_sre(void)
> +{
> + u64 val;
> +
> + asm volatile("mrs_s %0, " __stringify(ICC_SRE_EL1) : "=r" (val));
> + if (val & ICC_SRE_EL1_SRE)
> + return true;
> +
> + val |= ICC_SRE_EL1_SRE;
> + asm volatile("msr_s " __stringify(ICC_SRE_EL1) ", %0" : : "r" (val));
> + isb();
> + asm volatile("mrs_s %0, " __stringify(ICC_SRE_EL1) : "=r" (val));
> +
> + return !!(val & ICC_SRE_EL1_SRE);
> +}
I don't think !! is needed ;). Apparently, from ISO C99: "When any
scalar value is converted to _Bool, the result is 0 if the value
compares equal to 0; otherwise, the result is 1."
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-08 18:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/5] irqchip/gic-v3: Make gic_enable_sre an inline function |
| Message-ID | <qhlVw-8s5-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1242556 |
On 08/10/15 16:54, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:37:51PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> +static inline bool gic_enable_sre(void)
>> +{
>> + u64 val;
>> +
>> + asm volatile("mrs_s %0, " __stringify(ICC_SRE_EL1) : "=r" (val));
>> + if (val & ICC_SRE_EL1_SRE)
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + val |= ICC_SRE_EL1_SRE;
>> + asm volatile("msr_s " __stringify(ICC_SRE_EL1) ", %0" : : "r" (val));
>> + isb();
>> + asm volatile("mrs_s %0, " __stringify(ICC_SRE_EL1) : "=r" (val));
>> +
>> + return !!(val & ICC_SRE_EL1_SRE);
>> +}
>
> I don't think !! is needed ;). Apparently, from ISO C99: "When any
> scalar value is converted to _Bool, the result is 0 if the value
> compares equal to 0; otherwise, the result is 1."
Are you going to break my fingers? ;-)
From my very own PoV, !! acts as a reminder that I have realised what
the return type is. Yeah, that's how bad my brain is these days :-)
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web