Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1237762
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: CPU hotplug and chained interrupts on x86 |
| Date | 2015-10-01 23:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qeTTH-eK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qeN1U-795-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qeNbz-7kT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 1 Oct 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > Now if I plug/unplug the card I may get few interrupts to CPU0 but rest
> > of the interrupts never happen. Probably because IO-APIC forwards them
> > to the lowest priority CPU which is offline at this point.
> >
> > There is following check in fixup_irqs():
> >
> > if (!irq_has_action(irq) || irqd_is_per_cpu(data) ||
> > cpumask_subset(affinity, cpu_online_mask)) {
> > raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
> > continue;
> > }
> >
> > If an interrupt is requested by a driver it will force new affinity and
> > everything works fine. However if the interrupt is chained (it does not
> > have ->action) this is skipped and the current affinity remains.
> >
> > We could detect here if the interrupt is chained but there seems to be
> > no easy way to determine it currently so we would need to add a new flag
> > to desc->status_use_accessors that gets set in __irq_do_set_handler()
> > when is_chained is 1.
>
> Either there or in irq_data. Need to look at it in detail.
desc->status_use_accessors is the place where this wants to go.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
CPU hotplug and chained interrupts on x86 Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2015-10-01 16:30 +0200
Re: CPU hotplug and chained interrupts on x86 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-10-01 16:40 +0200
Re: CPU hotplug and chained interrupts on x86 Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-10-01 19:10 +0200
Re: CPU hotplug and chained interrupts on x86 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-10-01 23:50 +0200
Re: CPU hotplug and chained interrupts on x86 Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2015-10-02 07:00 +0200
csiph-web