Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1233668
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' |
| Date | 2015-09-27 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qdkuZ-kt-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qcEm5-746-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qd2HL-8he-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qd3u9-YZ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Saturday, September 26, 2015 09:33:56 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 26 September 2015 11:40:00 Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 25 September 2015 at 15:19, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > > > So if you allow something like debugfs to update your structure, how > > > do you make sure there is the proper locking? > > > > Not really sure at all.. Isn't there some debugfs locking that will > > jump in, to avoid updation of fields to the same device? > > No, if you need any locking to access variable, you cannot use the > simple debugfs helpers but have to provide your own functions. > > > >> Anyway, that problem isn't here for sure as its between two > > >> unsigned-longs. So, should I just move it to bool and resend ? > > > > > > I guess it might be more convenient to fold this into the other patch, > > > because we seem to be splitting hairs here. > > > > I can and that's what I did. But then Arnd asked me to separate it > > out. I can fold it back if that's what you want. > > It still makes sense to keep it separate I think, the patch is clearly > different from the other parts. I just don't see much point in going from unsigned long to u32 and then from 32 to bool if we can go directly to bool in one go. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-09-25 18:50 +0200
[PATCH V4 2/2] debugfs: Pass bool pointer to debugfs_create_bool() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-09-25 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> - 2015-09-25 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-09-25 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> - 2015-09-25 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-09-25 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-25 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-25 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-09-25 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-25 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-09-25 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2015-09-26 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-09-26 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-09-26 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-27 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-09-28 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-28 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2015-09-26 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-27 15:50 +0200
RE: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2015-09-28 11:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2015-09-28 16:30 +0200
RE: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2015-09-28 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2015-09-28 17:20 +0200
RE: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2015-09-28 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-25 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-25 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-09-27 16:40 +0200
csiph-web