Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1233061
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' |
| Date | 2015-09-25 22:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qcHWF-3PA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qcEm5-746-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qcHtD-3hv-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qcHMZ-3Ev-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Friday, September 25, 2015 01:25:49 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 25 September 2015 at 13:33, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > > You're going to change that into bool in the next patch, right? > > Yeah. > > > So what if bool is a byte and the field is not word-aligned > > Its between two 'unsigned long' variables today, and the struct isn't packed. > So, it will be aligned, isn't it? > > > and changing > > that byte requires a read-modify-write. How do we ensure that things remain > > consistent in that case? > > I didn't understood why a read-modify-write is special here? That's > what will happen > to most of the non-word-sized fields anyway? > > Probably I didn't understood what you meant.. Say you have three adjacent fields in a structure, x, y, z, each one byte long. Initially, all of them are equal to 0. CPU A writes 1 to x and CPU B writes 2 to y at the same time. What's the result? Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-09-25 18:50 +0200
[PATCH V4 2/2] debugfs: Pass bool pointer to debugfs_create_bool() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-09-25 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> - 2015-09-25 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-09-25 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> - 2015-09-25 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-09-25 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-25 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-25 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-09-25 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-25 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-09-25 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2015-09-26 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-09-26 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-09-26 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-27 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-09-28 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-28 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2015-09-26 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-27 15:50 +0200
RE: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2015-09-28 11:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2015-09-28 16:30 +0200
RE: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2015-09-28 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2015-09-28 17:20 +0200
RE: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2015-09-28 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-25 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-25 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock' Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-09-27 16:40 +0200
csiph-web