Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1232227

Re: [PATCH] perf record: Limit --intr-regs to platforms supporting PERF_REGS

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 08:32:12AM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 05:41:58PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> > > perf build currently fails on powerpc:
> > >
> > >   LINK     perf
> > > libperf.a(libperf-in.o):(.toc+0x120): undefined reference to
> > > `sample_reg_masks'
> > > libperf.a(libperf-in.o):(.toc+0x130): undefined reference to
> > > `sample_reg_masks'
> > > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> > > make[1]: *** [perf] Error 1
> > > make: *** [all] Error 2
> > >
> > > This is due to parse-regs-options.c using sample_reg_masks, which is
> > > defined only with CONFIG_PERF_REGS.
> > >
> > > In addition, perf record -I is only useful if the arch supports
> > > PERF_REGS. Hence, let's expose -I conditionally.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > hum, I wonder why we have sample_reg_masks defined as weak in util/perf_regs.c
> > which is also built only via CONFIG_PERF_REGS
> >
> > I wonder we could get rid of the weak definition via attached patch, Stephane?
> >
> But the whole point of having it weak is to avoid this error scenario
> on any arch without support
> and avoid ugly #ifdef HAVE_ in generic files.
> 
> if perf_regs.c is compiled on PPC, then why do we get the undefined?

sample_reg_masks is touched via parse-regs-options.c as well
and perf_regs.o depends on CONFIG_PERF_REGS

so with keeping the weak deffinition, how about attached change

jirka


---
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
index 142eeb341b29..19c8fd22fbe3 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
@@ -1082,9 +1082,11 @@ struct option __record_options[] = {
 		    "sample transaction flags (special events only)"),
 	OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "per-thread", &record.opts.target.per_thread,
 		    "use per-thread mmaps"),
+#ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
 	OPT_CALLBACK_OPTARG('I', "intr-regs", &record.opts.sample_intr_regs, NULL, "any register",
 		    "sample selected machine registers on interrupt,"
 		    " use -I ? to list register names", parse_regs),
+#endif
 	OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "running-time", &record.opts.running_time,
 		    "Record running/enabled time of read (:S) events"),
 	OPT_CALLBACK('k', "clockid", &record.opts,
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/Build b/tools/perf/util/Build
index 4bc7a9ab45b1..93c6371405a3 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/util/Build
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ libperf-$(CONFIG_LIBBABELTRACE) += data-convert-bt.o
 
 libperf-y += scripting-engines/
 
-libperf-$(CONFIG_PERF_REGS) += perf_regs.o
+libperf-y += perf_regs.o
 libperf-$(CONFIG_ZLIB) += zlib.o
 libperf-$(CONFIG_LZMA) += lzma.o
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] perf record: Limit --intr-regs to platforms supporting PERF_REGS "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-24 14:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] perf record: Limit --intr-regs to platforms supporting  PERF_REGS Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2015-09-24 15:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] perf record: Limit --intr-regs to platforms supporting PERF_REGS Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> - 2015-09-24 17:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] perf record: Limit --intr-regs to platforms supporting  PERF_REGS Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2015-09-24 18:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] perf record: Limit --intr-regs to platforms supporting  PERF_REGS "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-24 19:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] perf record: Limit --intr-regs to platforms supporting  PERF_REGS "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-29 07:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] perf record: Limit --intr-regs to platforms supporting  PERF_REGS Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2015-09-29 09:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] perf record: Limit --intr-regs to platforms supporting  PERF_REGS "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-29 10:10 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] perf record: Limit --intr-regs to platforms supporting  PERF_REGS Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2015-09-29 12:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] perf record: Limit --intr-regs to platforms supporting  PERF_REGS "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-29 18:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] perf record: Limit --intr-regs to platforms supporting  PERF_REGS Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2015-09-29 19:20 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] perf record: Limit --intr-regs to platforms supporting  PERF_REGS Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-29 22:10 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] perf record: Limit --intr-regs to platforms supporting  PERF_REGS Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2015-09-29 22:40 +0200

csiph-web