Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1230293

Re: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag

Show all headers | View raw

On 22/09/15 15:04, Manoil Claudiu wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@linutronix.de]

[...]

>>> on PPC architectures, the flag did the job.  When did this change? Since
>>> when using IRQF_NO_SUSPEND is a "misuse"?
>>
>> It always was. Simply because IRQF_NO_SUSPEND has absolutely nothing
>> to do with wakeup interrupt sources. It's a flag which excludes the
>> interrupt from the suspend mechanism, but it does not flag it a wakeup
>> source.
>>
>
> I'm seeing also a "powerpc: mpic" patch in the series, unfortunately I can't

Yes I think that was a redundant code, so I removed it. IIRC it was
setting IRQF_NO_SUSPEND in irq_set_wake callback which again is incorrect.

> afford to test it right now. However I ran a quick test with this gianfar patch
> in isolation on a powerpc system, and seen some difference in the behavior
> (with and w/o the patch).  In both cases the system wakes up from standby
> by magic packet.  However, without the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag 2 wake-up
> interrupts are reported in /proc/interrupts for one magic packet; with the

OK that's interesting, will have check if I have similar behavior on my
setup too.

> flag on there's just 1 interrupt.  Maybe this is not relevant, maybe the
> "powerpc: mpic" patch from this series changes this behavior.

Hmm not sure, but better to test it together if possible. If required we
can reorder for bisect-ability reasons.

> But if this is the API, what can I say? We'll see in time.  Btw, enable_irq_wake()
> returns an error code, normally it should be handled by printing a warning
> message at least, right?  But since most drivers don't handle that, I'm assuming
> it should be left unhandled to avoid overcomplicating things.

Yes I left it so that I can add if the maintainer insist and not churn
too much code adding warning.

> FWIW
> Acked-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@freescale.com>
>

Thanks.

Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2015-09-21 17:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2015-09-21 18:40 +0200
  RE: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND  flag Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-09-21 19:00 +0200
    RE: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Manoil Claudiu <claudiu.manoil@freescale.com> - 2015-09-22 16:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2015-09-22 17:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com> - 2015-09-23 23:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND  flag Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-09-24 00:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com> - 2015-09-24 23:20 +0200
  RE: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Manoil Claudiu <claudiu.manoil@freescale.com> - 2015-09-21 19:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND  flag David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2015-09-24 23:30 +0200

csiph-web