Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1229570
| From | Manoil Claudiu <claudiu.manoil@freescale.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag |
| Date | 2015-09-21 19:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qbcie-3Gm-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qbbvQ-2wt-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qbbvR-2wt-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
>-----Original Message----- >From: Sudeep Holla [mailto:sudeep.holla@arm.com] >Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 6:47 PM >To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>; Thomas Gleixner ><tglx@linutronix.de>; Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>; David S. Miller ><davem@davemloft.net>; Manoil Claudiu-B08782 ><claudiu.manoil@freescale.com>; Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>; >netdev@vger.kernel.org >Subject: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND >flag > >The device is set as wakeup capable using proper wakeup API but the >driver misuses IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to set the interrupt as wakeup source >which is incorrect. > >This patch removes the use of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flags replacing it with >enable_irq_wake instead. > What would be the purpose of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag then? The flag is a friendlier API compared to calling enable_irq_wake(). For older kernels, on PPC architectures, the flag did the job. When did this change? Since when using IRQF_NO_SUSPEND is a "misuse"? Thanks, Claudiu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2015-09-21 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2015-09-21 18:40 +0200
RE: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-09-21 19:00 +0200
RE: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Manoil Claudiu <claudiu.manoil@freescale.com> - 2015-09-22 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2015-09-22 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com> - 2015-09-23 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-09-24 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com> - 2015-09-24 23:20 +0200
RE: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Manoil Claudiu <claudiu.manoil@freescale.com> - 2015-09-21 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 13/17] net: gianfar: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2015-09-24 23:30 +0200
csiph-web