Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1230955

Re: [PATCH 17/17] mfd : ab8500/db8500: fix the abuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND

From Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 17/17] mfd : ab8500/db8500: fix the abuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
Date 2015-09-22 23:10 +0200
Message-ID <qbCZ3-af-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qbbvQ-2wt-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qbbvR-2wt-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <qbiH0-4zP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qbsGm-2d2-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On 22/09/15 00:20, Lee Jones wrote:
> >On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >
> >>The IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag is used to identify the interrupts that should
> >>be left enabled so as to allow them to work as expected during the
> >>suspend-resume cycle, but doesn't guarantee that it will wake the system
> >>from a suspended state, enable_irq_wake is recommended to be used for
> >>the wakeup.
> >>
> >>This patch removes the use of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flags replacing it with
> >>enable_irq_wake instead.
> >>
> >>Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> >>Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> >>Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> >>---
> >>  drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c        | 11 +++++++++--
> >>  drivers/mfd/ab8500-debugfs.c     |  2 +-
> >>  drivers/mfd/ab8500-gpadc.c       | 15 +++++++++++----
> >>  drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c       | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> >>  drivers/power/ab8500_btemp.c     |  6 ++++--
> >>  drivers/power/ab8500_charger.c   |  6 ++++--
> >>  drivers/power/ab8500_fg.c        |  9 ++++++---
> >>  drivers/thermal/db8500_thermal.c |  5 ++---
> >>  drivers/usb/phy/phy-ab8500-usb.c | 10 ++++++----
> >>  9 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >
> >Is there a reason for bundling the changes in all of these subsystems
> >together into a single patch?
> >
> 
> No, I understand this needs to be split. Since I was not 100% confident
> about this change, I wanted LinusW to review and provide feedback and
> gets things working before I can split this changes. I must have added
> RFC, but usually it gets ignored :)

Best if Linus reviews the correct patch-set.  Please split and
resubmit.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 17/17] mfd : ab8500/db8500: fix the abuse of  IRQF_NO_SUSPEND Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2015-09-22 12:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 17/17] mfd : ab8500/db8500: fix the abuse of  IRQF_NO_SUSPEND Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2015-09-22 23:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 17/17] mfd : ab8500/db8500: fix the abuse of  IRQF_NO_SUSPEND Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2015-09-23 11:50 +0200

csiph-web