Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1324610
| From | Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets |
| Date | 2016-02-02 21:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qXPTY-5z-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qPi8O-Fk-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXN5O-6qA-59@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXNSc-72M-67@gated-at.bofh.it> <qXOXT-7QE-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 02.02.2016 20:29, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa > <hannes@stressinduktion.org> wrote: >>> >>> Anyway, can someone provide a high-level description of what exactly >>> this patch is supposed to do? Which operation should be limited, who >>> should inflight FDs be accounted on, and which rlimit should be used >>> on each operation? I'm having a hard time auditing existing >>> user-space, given just the scarce description of this commit. >> >> Yes, all your observations are true. I think we need to explicitly >> need to refer to the sending socket while attaching the fds. > > I don't think that really helps. Maybe somebody passed a unix domain > socket around, and now we're crediting the wrong socket again. I was struggling a bit what you meant but I think you are referring to the following scenario: process-1 opens up a unix socket and passes it to process-2 (this process has different credentials) via af-unix. Process-2 then sends multiple fds to another destination over this transferred unix-fd. True, in this case we again account the fds to the wrong process, which is bad. > So how about we actually add a "struct cred *" to the scm_cookie > itself, and we initialize it to "get_current_cred()". And then always > use that. Unfortunately we never transfer a scm_cookie via the skbs but merely use it to initialize unix_skb_parms structure in skb->cb and destroy it afterwards. But "struct pid *" in unix_skb_parms should be enough to get us to corresponding "struct cred *" so we can decrement the correct counter during skb destruction. So: We increment current task's unix_inflight and also check the current task's limit during attaching fds to skbs and decrement the inflight counter via "struct pid *". This looks like it should work. > That way it's always the person who actually does the send (rather > than the opener of the socket _or_ the opener of the file that gets > passed around) that gets credited, and thanks to the cred pointer we > can then de-credit them properly. Exactly, I try to implement that. Thanks a lot! Hannes
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 18:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2016-02-02 19:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-02-02 20:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2016-02-02 21:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2016-02-02 23:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2016-02-03 02:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2016-02-03 02:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2016-02-02 21:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-02-02 21:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2016-02-02 22:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2016-02-02 22:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-02-02 22:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2016-02-02 22:00 +0100
RE: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2016-02-03 13:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie@collabora.co.uk> - 2016-02-03 12:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 13:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie@collabora.co.uk> - 2016-02-03 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2016-02-03 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2016-02-03 13:00 +0100
csiph-web