Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list

From	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list
Date	2016-01-27 11:20 +0100
Message-ID	<qVvmF-1Z6-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qULWz-1WT-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <qUM6f-20J-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qUNlE-33Y-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qVrsK-7FL-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 27/01/16 11:39, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:18:24AM +0000, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 25/01/16 15:20, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 25-01-16, 15:16, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> > > > Currently next_policy() explicitly checks if a policy is the last
> > > > policy in the cpufreq_policy_list. Use the standard list_is_last
> > > > primitive instead.
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 +++---
> > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > > > index 78b1e2f..b3059a3 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > > > @@ -67,11 +67,11 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *next_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > > >  {
> > > >  	lockdep_assert_held(&cpufreq_driver_lock);
> > 
> > Which branch is this patch based on?
> 
> My bad! This is based on your branch  git://linux-arm.org/linux-jl.git
> upstream/cpufreq_cleanups. I found this issue while reviewing your
> cleanup patches.
> 

No problem, and thanks for reviewing those! Any feedback? :)

Best,

- Juri

Thread

[PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-25 10:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the  policy list Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-01-25 11:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the  policy list Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-01-25 12:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the  policy list Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-01-25 12:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the  policy list Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-27 07:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the  policy list Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-27 07:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the  policy list Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-01-27 11:20 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the  policy list Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-27 12:20 +0100
  [PATCH RESEND] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-27 07:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH RESEND] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry  of the policy list Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-01-27 07:40 +0100

csiph-web