Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1316498
| From | Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list |
| Date | 2016-01-25 12:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qUNlE-33Y-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qULWz-1WT-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <qUM6f-20J-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi,
On 25/01/16 15:20, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 25-01-16, 15:16, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> > Currently next_policy() explicitly checks if a policy is the last
> > policy in the cpufreq_policy_list. Use the standard list_is_last
> > primitive instead.
> >
> > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > index 78b1e2f..b3059a3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -67,11 +67,11 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *next_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > {
> > lockdep_assert_held(&cpufreq_driver_lock);
Which branch is this patch based on?
Thanks,
- Juri
> > do {
> > - policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list);
> > -
> > /* No more policies in the list */
> > - if (&policy->policy_list == &cpufreq_policy_list)
> > + if (list_is_last(&policy->policy_list, &cpufreq_policy_list))
> > return NULL;
> > +
> > + policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list);
> > } while (!suitable_policy(policy, active));
> >
> > return policy;
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>
> --
> viresh
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-25 10:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-01-25 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-01-25 12:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-01-25 12:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-27 07:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-27 07:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2016-01-27 11:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-27 12:20 +0100
[PATCH RESEND] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-01-27 07:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH RESEND] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-01-27 07:40 +0100
csiph-web