Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay"

From	"Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay"
Date	2016-01-26 03:10 +0100
Message-ID	<qV1eV-4Gj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <qULtx-1Kq-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qULWA-1WT-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <qUOUq-40h-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qUZPQ-3CU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qV0LU-4dv-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 08:32:48AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> writes:
>> 
>> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:13:21PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>> >> Apart from the mail which Ying Huang sent to me last week for another error
>> >> (which actually turned out to be this one), i saw the first report by
>> >> Ying Huang on November.
>> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/2/93
>> >
>> > Ying, could you CC the subsystem list for these reports?  This one was
>> > CC'd to Sirnam, Greg and LKML.  Sirnam is too new to understand what
>> > they mean, Greg is too busy, and only Sudip and Alan Cox read LKML.
>> 
>> Sure.  But what is the best way to find the subsystem list for a patch?
>> Now we use author, committer, and the xxx-by: and Cc: list in patch to
>> find the recipient.
>
> For this one it's simple.  Get the filename from the git commit and
> use ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f $file.  That should work generally,
> the only issue is maybe some patches affect things across subsystems.
>
> Also I don't know if netdev wants these emails?  Do you guys CC them on
> 0day warnings?

Only if it appears in Cc: list of the commit.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

Thread

[PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay" Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 05:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-01-25 10:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-01-25 10:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 10:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-01-25 12:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 14:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay" Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2016-01-25 21:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay" "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2016-01-26 01:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-01-26 02:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay" "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2016-01-26 03:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-01-26 18:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-01-25 13:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 14:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-01-25 14:00 +0100

csiph-web