Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1317429

Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay"

From "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay"
Date 2016-01-26 01:40 +0100
Message-ID <qUZPQ-3CU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qU2G5-CL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qULtx-1Kq-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qULWA-1WT-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <qUOUq-40h-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> writes:

> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:13:21PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>> Apart from the mail which Ying Huang sent to me last week for another error
>> (which actually turned out to be this one), i saw the first report by
>> Ying Huang on November.
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/2/93
>
> Ying, could you CC the subsystem list for these reports?  This one was
> CC'd to Sirnam, Greg and LKML.  Sirnam is too new to understand what
> they mean, Greg is too busy, and only Sudip and Alan Cox read LKML.

Sure.  But what is the best way to find the subsystem list for a patch?
Now we use author, committer, and the xxx-by: and Cc: list in patch to
find the recipient.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay" Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 05:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-01-25 10:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-01-25 10:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 10:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-01-25 12:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 14:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay" Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2016-01-25 21:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay" "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2016-01-26 01:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-01-26 02:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay" "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2016-01-26 03:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-01-26 18:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-01-25 13:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 14:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over  udelay" Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-01-25 14:00 +0100

csiph-web