Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1315718

Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in efi_print_memmap

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 2016-01-23 at 19:18 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 6:44 PM, James Bottomley
> <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> > Not an attack on you patch per-se, but I really hate the IEC
> > convention
> > that was essentially a ploy by disk manufacturers to inflate their
> > disk
> > sizes by 10% simply by relabelling them.
> 
> >  Everyone was happy when a GB was 2^30,
> 
> No, not everyone. It was a misspelling done by some first storage
> producer.

No, it was the adopted convention in computer science to use units in
2^10 since all sizes were usually binary.  It actually began with
memory sizes.  So a GB never meant 10^9 bytes before 2007 because the
classical unit users had no idea what a byte was.  The first bytes were
counted in powers of 2.

>  Try to look at the problem from physics point of view. Units
> are essential part of a value. There is an agreement how to use
> multipliers and their code names. 1000 x Unit means kiloUnit. As per
> agreement.

It's not about physics (and certainly astronomers, who often take pi to
be 1 would be happy with 2^10 = 10^3) it's about politics: disk
manufacturers wanted a way to report bigger sizes, so they made a huge
fuss about the "inconsistency" of computer science using units in
increments of 2^10 and forced through this IEC standard.

> > now everyone's simply confused whenever they see GB.  We had
> > to pander to this in block devices because people got annoyed when 
> > we reported a size that was different from the label but are you 
> > sure we have to extend the madness to memory?
> 
> I actually don't know who is from us is being more conservative. I
> could call a madness to mess things from ancient (classical
> mathematics and physics) with something which has less than hundred
> years in development.

In engineering terms, counting in powers of 2 makes a lot of sense for
quantites using binary address busses and the IEC even recognised that
by inventing a new unit for it.  Having GB mean 2^30 up to 2007 and
10^9 after it is confusing for everyone born before about 1990.

James

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in efi_print_memmap Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-23 16:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in  efi_print_memmap James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-01-23 17:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in efi_print_memmap Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 18:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in  efi_print_memmap James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-01-23 19:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in  efi_print_memmap Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-25 09:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in  efi_print_memmap James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-01-25 16:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in  efi_print_memmap James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-01-23 19:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in  efi_print_memmap One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2016-01-23 21:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in efi_print_memmap "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2016-01-23 21:50 +0100
    RE: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in  efi_print_memmap "Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)" <elliott@hpe.com> - 2016-01-25 19:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in  efi_print_memmap James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-01-25 20:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in efi_print_memmap Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 20:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in  efi_print_memmap James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-01-25 20:50 +0100
            Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in efi_print_memmap Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 21:10 +0100
              Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in  efi_print_memmap James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-01-25 21:20 +0100
              RE: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in  efi_print_memmap "Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)" <elliott@hpe.com> - 2016-01-25 21:40 +0100
                Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in  efi_print_memmap Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-01-26 13:00 +0100
                Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in  efi_print_memmap Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-26 13:00 +0100
              Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: print size in binary units in  efi_print_memmap James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2016-01-25 21:50 +0100

csiph-web