Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1312990
| From | Peter Hung <hpeter@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file |
| Date | 2016-01-20 09:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qSWjo-3N7-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <qSA9b-5iQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSDJL-7SY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSEwa-8rZ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSRa4-5e-89@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSUrf-2Au-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Sudip, Sudip Mukherjee 於 2016/1/20 下午 02:22 寫道: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:59:28AM +0800, Peter Hung wrote: > But my personal opinion, if we move out the serial port related code > into a new driver (a new Kconfig symbol) userspace of many system will > break if this new symbol is not enabled by the distributions. But in the > way I have done the new symbol needs to be enabled only if the user > wants to use the GPIO capability. If that is not enabled GPIO cannot be > used but it will never break the serial port related code for them. > I think we should give a thought to that before splitting out the codes > from 8250_pci. I agree with your opinion. I'm trying to implement GPIO with 2 ways, One is like yours, add platform_device with in 8250_pci.c and implement GPIOLIB platform driver with in 'driver/gpio", and the other is trying split out from 8250_pci.c to MFD. In my personal opinion, the first method is less impact with compatible old system. -- With Best Regards, Peter Hung
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Peter Hung <hpeter@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 03:50 +0100
[PATCH 1/3] serial: 8250_pci: Remove Fintek PCIE UART driver Peter Hung <hpeter@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 03:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> - 2016-01-19 05:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Peter Hung <hpeter@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 09:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-19 10:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2016-01-19 13:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-19 14:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Peter Hung <hpeter@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 04:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 07:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Peter Hung <hpeter@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 09:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 14:50 +0100
csiph-web