Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1312852
| From | Peter Hung <hpeter@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file |
| Date | 2016-01-20 04:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qSRa4-5e-89@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qSuwO-1jJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSvCy-23U-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSA9b-5iQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSDJL-7SY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSEwa-8rZ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Andy, Alan Andy Shevchenko 於 2016/1/19 下午 09:21 寫道: >> Your device is multi-function. Create an MFD driver for it. Make the >> 8250 driver bind to the MFD, and provide your own baud rate methods >> within the standard 8250 layer > > Ouch, somehow I missed this one! > > Peter, Alan's suggestion is really worth to try. > Thanks for point this. It seems good to probe on MFD driver, them MFD register platform devices to invoke platform driver to initialize sub-parts. I'll try to survey first. But I had a new question, If I really do it with MFD subsystem, it'll split into 3 parts, MFD probe(driver/mfd) / GPIO (driver/gpio) / UART (drivers/tty/serial/8250). It'll cross more than 2 subsystems and maintainers How should I do to organize the patches? For examples, I should remove the probe function in 8250_pci.c and move it to new MFD file. It should organize it in the same patch as Paul said, but this patch will need 2 subsystem maintainer to do with the same patch, it seems weird. Andy had cc "[PATCH v5] serial: 8250: add gpio support to exar" to me, could I use the same way to do GPIOLIB? First add a platform driver for F81504 gpio and add platform device into 8250_pci.c? It seems to be good and simple to implement. -- With Best Regards, Peter Hung
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Peter Hung <hpeter@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 03:50 +0100
[PATCH 1/3] serial: 8250_pci: Remove Fintek PCIE UART driver Peter Hung <hpeter@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 03:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> - 2016-01-19 05:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Peter Hung <hpeter@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 09:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-19 10:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2016-01-19 13:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-01-19 14:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Peter Hung <hpeter@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 04:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 07:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Peter Hung <hpeter@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 09:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 12:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8250: Split Fintek PCIE to UART to independent file Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 14:50 +0100
csiph-web