Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1306717
| From | Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] serial: amba-pl011: add ACPI support to AMBA probe |
| Date | 2016-01-11 22:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qPSlX-84V-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <qISAq-2iG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNmzU-1JR-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNvDb-84L-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNCEG-5ih-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qNU8A-jS-67@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Graeme Gregory wrote: >> > >> >So with this patch, what is the difference between sbsa_uart_probe and >> >pl011_probe? Shouldn't the patch also remove sbsa_uart_probe? >> > > One is for amba_device and one is for platform_device and one maintainer > indicated displeasure at platfrom device being in an AMBA driver. Ok, I'm still a little confused, but it sounds to me like your patch should have also removed sbsa_uart_probe(). With your patches applied, under what circumstance would sbsa_uart_probe() still be called? The amba-pl011.c driver already probes on ARMH0011, so shouldn't that be removed, to avoid a double probe?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] serial: amba-pl011: add ACPI support to AMBA probe Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> - 2016-01-05 00:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] serial: amba-pl011: add ACPI support to AMBA probe G Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org> - 2016-01-05 10:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] serial: amba-pl011: add ACPI support to AMBA probe Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> - 2016-01-05 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] serial: amba-pl011: add ACPI support to AMBA probe Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk> - 2016-01-06 12:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] serial: amba-pl011: add ACPI support to AMBA probe Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> - 2016-01-11 22:40 +0100
csiph-web