Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1227228
| From | Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: DEFINE_IDA causing memory leaks? (was Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtio ida cache layers) |
| Date | 2015-09-17 19:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q9L0K-1KM-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <q9vfk-3Em-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <q9A5j-2mG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q9Icx-607-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <q9JV1-bo-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <q9KxJ-W9-45@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello, On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:48:37AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > Well, there's an easy fix for that. We could have ida_remove() actually > free the bitmap and not cache it if it's the last layer. That way ida > would naturally empty and we wouldn't need a destructor. Tejun, would > that work? Yeah, that definitely is one way to go about it. It kinda muddles the purpose of ida_destroy() tho. I suppose we can rename it to idr_remove_all() and then do the same to idr. I'm not particularly objecting to all that but what's wrong with just calling idr_destroy() on exit paths? If missing the call in modules is an issue, maybe we can just annotate idr/ida with debugobj? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/2] Fix memory leaks in virtio & remoteproc cores Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> - 2015-09-17 02:30 +0200
[PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: fix memory leak of remoteproc ida cache layers Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> - 2015-09-17 02:30 +0200
[PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtio ida cache layers Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> - 2015-09-17 02:30 +0200
DEFINE_IDA causing memory leaks? (was Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtio ida cache layers) "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2015-09-17 07:40 +0200
Re: DEFINE_IDA causing memory leaks? (was Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtio ida cache layers) Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> - 2015-09-17 09:00 +0200
Re: DEFINE_IDA causing memory leaks? (was Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtio ida cache layers) Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> - 2015-09-18 00:40 +0200
Re: DEFINE_IDA causing memory leaks? (was Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtio ida cache layers) James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2015-09-17 16:20 +0200
Re: DEFINE_IDA causing memory leaks? (was Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtio ida cache layers) Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 17:20 +0200
Re: DEFINE_IDA causing memory leaks? (was Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtio ida cache layers) "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2015-09-17 18:10 +0200
Re: DEFINE_IDA causing memory leaks? (was Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtio ida cache layers) James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2015-09-17 18:50 +0200
Re: DEFINE_IDA causing memory leaks? (was Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtio ida cache layers) Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 19:20 +0200
Re: DEFINE_IDA causing memory leaks? (was Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtio ida cache layers) James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> - 2015-09-17 20:00 +0200
Re: DEFINE_IDA causing memory leaks? (was Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtio ida cache layers) Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 20:10 +0200
csiph-web