Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1206552

Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class

From Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class
Date 2015-08-13 09:20 +0200
Message-ID <pWUXU-4He-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <pWTIu-2Kb-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pWUlb-3IA-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 06:41:45AM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:55:55PM +0900, byungchul.park@lge.com wrote:
> > 
> > currently, a task load is synced with its cfs_rq, only when it
> > leaves from fair class. we also need to sync it with cfs_rq when
> > it returns back to fair class, too.
>  
> Syncing it at the time it is switched to fair is not necessary, because
> since last_update_time if it has ever been updated, the load has become
> random, IOW, useless. So we simply leave it unattended, and let itself
> merge in the system.

hello,

i agree with you almost. it would have a meaningless value over time,
while it has a meaningful value as soon as it leaved that cfs_rq.

however, IMHO, nobody know when a task is switched between sched classes.
i think it would be better that we consider that load rather than leave
it unattended, even though, of course, in both of cases __update_load_avg()
will dacay and fix it over time.

shouldn't we consider it?

1. case returning back to fair class very soon:
original code cannot reflect the task load to cfs_rq, while
patched code can reflect the task load to cfs_rq.

2. case returning back to fair class after long:
original code adds 0 to cfs_rq and let __update_load_avg() fix it, while
patched code adds a meaningless value to cfs_rq and let
__update_load_avg() fix it, afterall these become same.

> 
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> >  	/* synchronize task with its prev cfs_rq */
> > -	if (!queued)
> > -		__update_load_avg(cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time, cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq)),
> > -				&se->avg, se->on_rq * scale_load_down(se->load.weight),
> > -				cfs_rq->curr == se, NULL);
> > -
> > -	/* remove our load when we leave */
> > -	cfs_rq->avg.load_avg = max_t(long, cfs_rq->avg.load_avg - se->avg.load_avg, 0);
> > -	cfs_rq->avg.load_sum = max_t(s64, cfs_rq->avg.load_sum - se->avg.load_sum, 0);
> > -	cfs_rq->avg.util_avg = max_t(long, cfs_rq->avg.util_avg - se->avg.util_avg, 0);
> > -	cfs_rq->avg.util_sum = max_t(s32, cfs_rq->avg.util_sum - se->avg.util_sum, 0);
> > +	detach_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
> >  #endif
> 
> You changed the logic.

yes, i changed it. but i think that calling __update_load_avg() is not
a problem even in case of "queued == 1". so i didn't think that change
seriously.

wrong? :(

thanks,
byungchul

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class byungchul.park@lge.com - 2015-08-13 08:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> - 2015-08-13 08:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2015-08-13 09:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> - 2015-08-13 12:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-08-13 09:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2015-08-13 10:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> - 2015-08-13 12:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2015-08-13 13:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-08-13 17:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> - 2015-08-14 09:20 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-08-14 10:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2015-08-15 09:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2015-08-15 09:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2015-08-13 10:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class "T. Zhou" <t.s.zhou@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2015-08-15 06:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] sched: sync with the cfs_rq when changing sched class "T. Zhou" <t.s.zhou@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-15 14:50 +0200

csiph-web