Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #173280 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-07 20:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-10-26 18:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 27 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-07 20:10 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> - 2016-10-07 20:30 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. claude juif <claude.juif@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 20:40 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> - 2016-10-07 21:50 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-10-08 00:50 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-10-08 01:00 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> - 2016-10-08 04:10 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. claude juif <claude.juif@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 17:30 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-08 17:40 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-08 17:40 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-10-08 20:10 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2016-10-09 13:20 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-09 13:30 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Lars Noodén <lars.nooden@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 13:40 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2016-10-09 13:40 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-09 15:10 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. claude juif <claude.juif@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 18:00 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-09 21:10 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. rhkramer@gmail.com - 2016-10-09 22:30 +0200
ifconfig question (recovered from hijacked thread ) Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> - 2016-10-10 19:30 +0200
Linux source address selection (Was Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.) Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2016-10-12 04:40 +0200
Re: Linux source address selection (Was Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2016-10-12 11:40 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2016-10-09 18:20 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 18:00 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-09 13:30 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2016-10-09 13:30 +0200
Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 18:00 +0200
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 20:10 +0200 |
| Subject | url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. |
| Message-ID | <spHKP-49t-47@gated-at.bofh.it> |
I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate anything untoward or fishy. The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE. Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though. How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? tia tony -- http://tonybaldwin.me all tony, all the time
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 20:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <spI4a-4kf-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #173280 |
I can now also verify that the page loads fine n Dolphin browser on my android device. On 10/07/2016 02:00 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote: > I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media > consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. > Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm > getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", > If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, > But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing > has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder > or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate > anything untoward or fishy. > The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE. > Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though. > > How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some > browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I > can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? > > tia > tony > -- http://www.baldwinlinguas.com translations, localization, multilingual web development EN, ES, FR, PT
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | claude juif <claude.juif@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 20:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <spIdP-4nx-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #173282 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
2016-10-07 20:04 GMT+02:00 Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com>: > I can now also verify that the page loads fine n Dolphin browser on my > android device. > > On 10/07/2016 02:00 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote: > >> I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media >> consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. >> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm >> getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", >> If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, >> But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing >> has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder >> or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate >> anything untoward or fishy. >> The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE. >> Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though. >> > Hi, it works well in my Chrome Browser. May be you have some proxy between, or a misconfigured /etc/hosts entry. Did you try to load it with all plugins disabled ? >> How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some >> browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I >> can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? >> >> tia >> tony >> >> > -- > http://www.baldwinlinguas.com > translations, localization, > multilingual web development > EN, ES, FR, PT > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-07 21:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <spJjA-537-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #173283 |
On 10/07/2016 02:32 PM, claude juif wrote: > > > 2016-10-07 20:04 GMT+02:00 Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com > <mailto:baldwinlinguas@gmx.com>>: > > I can now also verify that the page loads fine n Dolphin browser on > my android device. > > On 10/07/2016 02:00 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote: > > I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media > consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. > Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm > getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", > If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy > landing page, > But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and > nothing > has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an > intruder > or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to > indicate > anything untoward or fishy. > The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, > or IE. > Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though. > > > Hi, it works well in my Chrome Browser. > > May be you have some proxy between, or a misconfigured /etc/hosts entry. > > Did you try to load it with all plugins disabled ? Thanks, I use no proxy/ies, neither at home, nor on the remote server. My brother, who brought the matter to my attention was also using chrome . disabling my extensions doesn't seem to make any difference. There appears no mention of the url in any of my hosts files (neither at home, nor on the server), nor anything that would redirect the IP address, since I can load other sites on the same server (and the myownsite.me domain) without troubles. What else can I do? > > > How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in > some > browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and > how I > can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? > > tia > tony > > > -- > http://www.baldwinlinguas.com > translations, localization, > multilingual web development > EN, ES, FR, PT > > -- http://www.baldwinlinguas.com translations, localization, multilingual web development EN, ES, FR, PT
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | davidson@freevolt.org |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 00:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. |
| Message-ID | <spM7L-70p-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #173280 |
On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote: > I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media > consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. > Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm getting > redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", > If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, > But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has > changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any > such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate anything > untoward or fishy. > The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE. > Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though. > > How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some > browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I can > stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? This problem sounds bizarre to me. One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com) will point urls in email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email provider can log what you read). For example, a link labeled http://playomatic.myownsite.me will point to https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code]/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of yours, then following such links in emails might result in unexpected behaviour not unlike what you are seeing. A shot in the dark, for what its worth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | davidson@freevolt.org |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 01:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. |
| Message-ID | <spMhs-749-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #173303 |
On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, davidson@freevolt.org wrote: > On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote: > >> I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media >> consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. >> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm >> getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", >> If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, >> But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has >> changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any >> such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate anything >> untoward or fishy. >> The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE. >> Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though. >> >> How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some >> browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I can >> stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? > > This problem sounds bizarre to me. > > One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that > some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com) will point urls in > email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email provider > can log what you read). > > For example, a link labeled > > http://playomatic.myownsite.me > > will point to > > https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code]/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me > > If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of > yours, then following such links in emails might result in unexpected > behaviour not unlike what you are seeing. > > A shot in the dark, for what its worth. My point here, which I may not have made clear, is that when you test the site in each browser, make sure you are really requesting http://playomatic.myownsite.me, not the redirect some email provider may have replaced it with.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 04:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <spPfj-LZ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #173303 |
On 10/07/2016 06:42 PM, davidson@freevolt.org wrote: > On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote: > >> I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media >> consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. >> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm >> getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", >> If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, >> But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing >> has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder >> or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate >> anything untoward or fishy. >> The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE. >> Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though. >> >> How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some >> browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I >> can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? > > This problem sounds bizarre to me. > > One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that > some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com) will point urls in > email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email provider > can log what you read). But I'm typing the url directly into the browser, and not clicking on a link in an e-mail. Also, when I sign out of chrome/chromium-sync, it works fine again. so yeah, definitely something very odd going on. > > For example, a link labeled > > http://playomatic.myownsite.me > > will point to > > https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code]/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me > > > If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of > yours, then following such links in emails might result in unexpected > behaviour not unlike what you are seeing. > > A shot in the dark, for what its worth. > -- http://www.baldwinlinguas.com translations, localization, multilingual web development EN, ES, FR, PT
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | claude juif <claude.juif@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 17:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sq1Jv-ju-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #173312 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
2016-10-08 3:53 GMT+02:00 Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com>: > > > On 10/07/2016 06:42 PM, davidson@freevolt.org wrote: > >> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote: >> >> I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media >>> consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. >>> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm >>> getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", >>> If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, >>> But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing >>> has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder >>> or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate >>> anything untoward or fishy. >>> The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE. >>> Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though. >>> >>> How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some >>> browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I >>> can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? >>> >> >> This problem sounds bizarre to me. >> >> One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that >> some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com) will point urls in >> email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email provider >> can log what you read). >> > > But I'm typing the url directly into the browser, and not clicking on a > link in an e-mail. > Also, when I sign out of chrome/chromium-sync, it works fine again. so > yeah, definitely something very odd going on. > >> >> For example, a link labeled >> >> http://playomatic.myownsite.me >> >> will point to >> >> https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code] >> /dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me >> <https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/%5BSome-Alpha-Numeric-Code%5D/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me> >> >> >> If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of >> yours, then following such links in emails might result in unexpected >> behaviour not unlike what you are seeing. >> >> A shot in the dark, for what its worth. >> > Can you use the chrome developper tools to see what's going on ? (Press the F12 key while chrome is open) Select the network tab, and type the url in your address bar. The network panel should show you what happens > >> > -- > http://www.baldwinlinguas.com > translations, localization, > multilingual web development > EN, ES, FR, PT > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 17:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sq1Tc-my-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #173319 |
On 10/08/2016 11:28 AM, claude juif wrote: > > 2016-10-08 3:53 GMT+02:00 Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com > <mailto:baldwinlinguas@gmx.com>>: > > > > On 10/07/2016 06:42 PM, davidson@freevolt.org > <mailto:davidson@freevolt.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote: > > I have a little business card website up for my big > brother's media > consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. > Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in > Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm > getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", > If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy > landing page, > But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, > and nothing > has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by > an intruder > or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to > indicate > anything untoward or fishy. > The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, > Safari, or IE. > Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, > though. > > How can I determine what's interfering with this page > loading in some > browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, > and how I > can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? > > > This problem sounds bizarre to me. > > One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that > some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com > <http://gmx.com>) will point urls in > email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email > provider > can log what you read). > > > But I'm typing the url directly into the browser, and not clicking > on a link in an e-mail. > Also, when I sign out of chrome/chromium-sync, it works fine again. > so yeah, definitely something very odd going on. > > > For example, a link labeled > > http://playomatic.myownsite.me <http://playomatic.myownsite.me> > > will point to > > https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code]/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me > <https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/%5BSome-Alpha-Numeric-Code%5D/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me> > > > If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of > yours, then following such links in emails might result in > unexpected > behaviour not unlike what you are seeing. > > A shot in the dark, for what its worth. As soon as I type in the url, it goes to http://bridge.sf.admarketplace.net/bounce?click_id=1475940640200100010&m_width=1680&m_height=1050&b_width=624&b_height=860&b_top=5&b_left=33&in_iframe=0 whereas traceroute shows it going to my modem-> a local hub-> Comcast's DNS server in Boston, then to New York, then jumping to Frankfurt -> Munich, then the server I rent from Contabo which is in Munich, afaik. Thanks, Tony > > -- http://tonybaldwin.me all tony, all the time
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 17:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sq1Tc-my-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #173319 |
On 10/08/2016 11:28 AM, claude juif wrote: > > 2016-10-08 3:53 GMT+02:00 Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com > <mailto:baldwinlinguas@gmx.com>>: > > > > On 10/07/2016 06:42 PM, davidson@freevolt.org > <mailto:davidson@freevolt.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote: > > I have a little business card website up for my big > brother's media > consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. > Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in > Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm > getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", > If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy > landing page, > But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, > and nothing > has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by > an intruder > or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to > indicate > anything untoward or fishy. > The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, > Safari, or IE. > Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, > though. > > How can I determine what's interfering with this page > loading in some > browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, > and how I > can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence? > > > This problem sounds bizarre to me. > > One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that > some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com > <http://gmx.com>) will point urls in > email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email > provider > can log what you read). > > > But I'm typing the url directly into the browser, and not clicking > on a link in an e-mail. > Also, when I sign out of chrome/chromium-sync, it works fine again. > so yeah, definitely something very odd going on. > > > For example, a link labeled > > http://playomatic.myownsite.me <http://playomatic.myownsite.me> > > will point to > > https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code]/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me > <https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/%5BSome-Alpha-Numeric-Code%5D/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me> > > > If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of > yours, then following such links in emails might result in > unexpected > behaviour not unlike what you are seeing. > > A shot in the dark, for what its worth. > > > > Can you use the chrome developper tools to see what's going on ? (Press > the F12 key while chrome is open) Select the network tab, and type the > url in your address bar. > The network panel should show you what happens That doesn't seem to tell me anything traceroute doesn't, except trqacerout doesn't get redirect to a Yahoo! search like chrome does, but nothing I see there seems ot clarify WHY or HOW it's getting redirected, it's just showing me that it IS being led though some circolocuitous route to where it should not. > > > > > > -- > http://www.baldwinlinguas.com > translations, localization, > multilingual web development > EN, ES, FR, PT > > -- http://tonybaldwin.me all tony, all the time
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 20:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. |
| Message-ID | <sq4el-1UU-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #173321 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 11:35:21AM -0400, Tony Baldwin wrote: [...] > >Can you use the chrome developper tools to see what's going on ? (Press > >the F12 key while chrome is open) Select the network tab, and type the > >url in your address bar. > >The network panel should show you what happens > > That doesn't seem to tell me anything traceroute doesn't, except > trqacerout doesn't get redirect to a Yahoo! search like chrome does, > but nothing I see there seems ot clarify WHY or HOW it's getting > redirected, it's just showing me that it IS being led though some > circolocuitous route to where it should not. A shot in the dark, but worth a try anyway: IPV4 vs IPV6? But I'd rather suspect Chrome doing something weird to the URL before resolving (or -- who knows! having its own built-in resolver). Perhaps looking at the traffic with tcpdump/wireshark can give you an idea. Regards - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlf5NeoACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZ+PQCeOsGFniEXtN/uNxh7xpHmc5jg SG0AmgMz751oR58+BwBJEKN5RP60UsGK =NsR2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 13:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sqkj7-3v1-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #173280 |
On 08/10/16 07:00, Tony Baldwin wrote: > I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media > consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me. > Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm > getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web", > If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page, This is probably a long shot ... is it a recent chrome/chromium? It seems to work fine for me in jessie. Just wondering if it sees a url that doesn't start with www, and ends with a slightly unusual '.me', and tries to 'autocorrect'. But .me is a country code TLD, not one of the new ones as I first thought, so it shouldn't be that. Richard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 13:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sqksO-3zs-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #173345 |
On 10/09/2016 07:23 AM, Richard Hector wrote: > On 10/10/16 00:20, Tony Baldwin wrote: >> What country is .me? here in th US, of course, it could be the State of >> Maine. > > Montenegro, apparently. According to a quick web search ;-) > > Richard > Thanks, I was curious, couldn't think of anything, all the Ms I could think of were thins like Maroc, Moçambique, Macao, and the like, where .ma, .mc, .mo, or some such think would make more sense. I kind of think Montenegro should be .Mn, really (or that for the US stat of Minnesota). Tony -- http://tonybaldwin.me all tony, all the time
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lars Noodén <lars.nooden@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 13:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sqkCt-3Cr-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #173346 |
On 10/09/2016 02:28 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote: > > > On 10/09/2016 07:23 AM, Richard Hector wrote: >> On 10/10/16 00:20, Tony Baldwin wrote: >>> What country is .me? here in th US, of course, it could be the State of >>> Maine. >> >> Montenegro, apparently. According to a quick web search ;-) >> >> Richard >> > > Thanks, I was curious, couldn't think of anything, all the Ms I could > think of were thins like Maroc, Moçambique, Macao, and the like, where > .ma, .mc, .mo, or some such think would make more sense. > I kind of think Montenegro should be .Mn, really (or that for the US > stat of Minnesota). > Tony > The complete list is all in ISO-3166. It has two-letter codes as well as three-letter codes. ISO 639, in contrast, covers languages. I'd seen some sites mix them up. Regards, Lars
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 13:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sqkCu-3Cr-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #173346 |
On 10/10/16 00:28, Tony Baldwin wrote: > > > On 10/09/2016 07:23 AM, Richard Hector wrote: >> On 10/10/16 00:20, Tony Baldwin wrote: >>> What country is .me? here in th US, of course, it could be the >>> State of Maine. >> >> Montenegro, apparently. According to a quick web search ;-) >> >> Richard >> > > Thanks, I was curious, couldn't think of anything, all the Ms I > could think of were thins like Maroc, Moçambique, Macao, and the > like, where .ma, .mc, .mo, or some such think would make more > sense. I kind of think Montenegro should be .Mn, really (or that > for the US stat of Minnesota). That's Mongolia :-) It appears that Montenegro only came into existence (most recently) in 2006 - it was part of Yugoslavia, then 'Serbia and Montenegro'. So all the 'good' codes were presumably taken. I'm looking here: http://www.domainsherpa.com/country-code-top-level-domains/ But we're getting a bit off-topic :-) Richard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 15:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sqm1z-4zb-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #173350 |
On 10/09/2016 07:36 AM, Richard Hector wrote: > On 10/10/16 00:28, Tony Baldwin wrote: > > But we're getting a bit off-topic :-) > > Richard > Indeed we are, but I thank you for humoring my curiosity. Thanks, Tony -- http://tonybaldwin.me all tony, all the time
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | claude juif <claude.juif@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 18:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sqoG5-66q-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #173352 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Are you logged in with a google account on that chrome/chromium ? By the way, how did you install them ? To resume : On your debian computer, only for this website, you get redirect to ads only with chrome/chromium ? I would try these : purge chromium and chrome. Install chromium and go to your website. (do not log in before). The only things i can think of is broken extension. I've never see this happening, it's really strange. If that happens on windows i would have say, search for malware and delete them. 2016-10-09 15:00 GMT+02:00 Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com>: > > > On 10/09/2016 07:36 AM, Richard Hector wrote: > >> On 10/10/16 00:28, Tony Baldwin wrote: >> > > >> But we're getting a bit off-topic :-) >> >> Richard >> >> > Indeed we are, but I thank you for humoring my curiosity. > Thanks, > > Tony > -- > http://tonybaldwin.me > all tony, all the time > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 21:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sqrDX-89N-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #173354 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 10/09/2016 11:54 AM, claude juif wrote: > Are you logged in with a google account on that chrome/chromium ? By > the way, how did you install them ? I WAS logged into my google account when I had the problem, in fact, but eventually determined that when I logged out, I could load the proper page for the url, oddly. I installed chromium with aptitude, google-chrome-stable by downloading google's .deb pkg and doing sudo dpkg -i $said-google-pkg.deb > > To resume : > On your debian computer, only for this website, you get redirect to > ads only with chrome/chromium ? That is correct, Iceweasel, w3m, lynx and e-links all load the proper page/site. Chrome and dolphin on my android phone do fine, as well, but apparently chrome on iOS (what my brother was using when he found the problem), does not. > > I would try these : > > purge chromium and chrome. > Install chromium and go to your website. (do not log in before). > > The only things i can think of is broken extension. I've never see > this happening, it's really strange. If that happens on windows i > would have say, search for malware and delete them. > > > > 2016-10-09 15:00 GMT+02:00 Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com > <mailto:tonybaldwin@gmx.com>>: > > > > On 10/09/2016 07:36 AM, Richard Hector wrote: > > On 10/10/16 00:28, Tony Baldwin wrote: > > > > But we're getting a bit off-topic :-) > > Richard > > > Indeed we are, but I thank you for humoring my curiosity. > Thanks, > > Tony > -- > http://tonybaldwin.me > all tony, all the time > > -- http://tonybaldwin.me all tony, all the time
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rhkramer@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-09 22:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. |
| Message-ID | <sqsTo-mZ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #173359 |
I'm not the OP, and I'm sort of piggybacking and going somewhat (or a lot?) OT, but I am curious about how old inet4 (right term?) and the new inet6 addresses interact. When I do ifconfig, I see that eth0 has both a 32 bit (e.g., 192.168.1.19) and an inet6 address assigned. Can anybody point me to a fairly short document that explains things like which gets used under what circumstances, does one have precedence over the other, do they both use DNS, and similar things which might let me make sense of the situation? On Sunday, October 09, 2016 03:02:25 PM Tony Baldwin wrote: > On 10/09/2016 11:54 AM, claude juif wrote: > > Are you logged in with a google account on that chrome/chromium ? By > > the way, how did you install them ? >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-10 19:30 +0200 |
| Subject | ifconfig question (recovered from hijacked thread ) |
| Message-ID | <sqMyK-412-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #173361 |
On 10/09/2016 04:23 PM, rhkramer@gmail.com wrote: > I'm not the OP, and I'm sort of piggybacking and going somewhat (or a lot?) > OT, but I am curious about how old inet4 (right term?) and the new inet6 > addresses interact. > > When I do ifconfig, I see that eth0 has both a 32 bit (e.g., 192.168.1.19) and > an inet6 address assigned. > > Can anybody point me to a fairly short document that explains things like > which gets used under what circumstances, does one have precedence over the > other, do they both use DNS, and similar things which might let me make sense > of the situation? Don't hijack another thread, send a new mail with an appropriate subject line like the one on this message. That way you're more likely to get the help you need, and it's just proper list edicate. Good luck tony (OP of the thread you tried to hijack) -- http://www.baldwinlinguas.com translations, localization, multilingual web development EN, ES, FR, PT
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web