Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #173303

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

From davidson@freevolt.org
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
Date 2016-10-08 00:50 +0200
Message-ID <spM7L-70p-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <spHKP-49t-47@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote:

> I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media 
> consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me.
> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm getting 
> redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web",
> If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page,
> But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has 
> changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any 
> such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate anything 
> untoward or fishy.
> The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE.
> Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though.
>
> How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some 
> browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I can 
> stop it or prevent future re-occurrence?

This problem sounds bizarre to me.

One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that
some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com) will point urls in
email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email provider
can log what you read).

For example, a link labeled

  http://playomatic.myownsite.me

will point to

  https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code]/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me

If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of
yours, then following such links in emails might result in unexpected
behaviour not unlike what you are seeing.

A shot in the dark, for what its worth.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-07 20:10 +0200
  Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> - 2016-10-07 20:30 +0200
    Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. claude juif <claude.juif@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 20:40 +0200
      Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> - 2016-10-07 21:50 +0200
  Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according  to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-10-08 00:50 +0200
    Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according  to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-10-08 01:00 +0200
    Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> - 2016-10-08 04:10 +0200
      Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. claude juif <claude.juif@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 17:30 +0200
        Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-08 17:40 +0200
        Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-08 17:40 +0200
          Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according  to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-10-08 20:10 +0200
  Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2016-10-09 13:20 +0200
    Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-09 13:30 +0200
      Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Lars Noodén <lars.nooden@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 13:40 +0200
      Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2016-10-09 13:40 +0200
        Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-09 15:10 +0200
          Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. claude juif <claude.juif@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 18:00 +0200
            Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-09 21:10 +0200
              Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. rhkramer@gmail.com - 2016-10-09 22:30 +0200
                ifconfig question (recovered from hijacked thread ) Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> - 2016-10-10 19:30 +0200
                Linux source address selection (Was Re: url redirected in  chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx,  w3m, iceweasel.) Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2016-10-12 04:40 +0200
                Re: Linux source address selection (Was Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2016-10-12 11:40 +0200
        Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2016-10-09 18:20 +0200
      Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 18:00 +0200
    Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-09 13:30 +0200
      Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2016-10-09 13:30 +0200
  Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 18:00 +0200

csiph-web