Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #173307

Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

From davidson@freevolt.org
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
Date 2016-10-08 01:00 +0200
Message-ID <spMhs-749-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <spHKP-49t-47@gated-at.bofh.it> <spM7L-70p-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, davidson@freevolt.org wrote:

> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>
>> I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media 
>> consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me.
>> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm 
>> getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web",
>> If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page,
>> But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has 
>> changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any 
>> such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate anything 
>> untoward or fishy.
>> The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE.
>> Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though.
>> 
>> How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some 
>> browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I can 
>> stop it or prevent future re-occurrence?
>
> This problem sounds bizarre to me.
>
> One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that
> some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com) will point urls in
> email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email provider
> can log what you read).
>
> For example, a link labeled
>
> http://playomatic.myownsite.me
>
> will point to
>
> https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code]/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me
>
> If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of
> yours, then following such links in emails might result in unexpected
> behaviour not unlike what you are seeing.
>
> A shot in the dark, for what its worth.

My point here, which I may not have made clear, is that when you test
the site in each browser, make sure you are really requesting
http://playomatic.myownsite.me, not the redirect some email provider
may have replaced it with.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-07 20:10 +0200
  Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> - 2016-10-07 20:30 +0200
    Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. claude juif <claude.juif@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 20:40 +0200
      Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> - 2016-10-07 21:50 +0200
  Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according  to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-10-08 00:50 +0200
    Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according  to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-10-08 01:00 +0200
    Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> - 2016-10-08 04:10 +0200
      Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. claude juif <claude.juif@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 17:30 +0200
        Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-08 17:40 +0200
        Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-08 17:40 +0200
          Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according  to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-10-08 20:10 +0200
  Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2016-10-09 13:20 +0200
    Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-09 13:30 +0200
      Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Lars Noodén <lars.nooden@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 13:40 +0200
      Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2016-10-09 13:40 +0200
        Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-09 15:10 +0200
          Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. claude juif <claude.juif@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 18:00 +0200
            Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-09 21:10 +0200
              Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. rhkramer@gmail.com - 2016-10-09 22:30 +0200
                ifconfig question (recovered from hijacked thread ) Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> - 2016-10-10 19:30 +0200
                Linux source address selection (Was Re: url redirected in  chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx,  w3m, iceweasel.) Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2016-10-12 04:40 +0200
                Re: Linux source address selection (Was Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2016-10-12 11:40 +0200
        Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2016-10-09 18:20 +0200
      Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 18:00 +0200
    Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-09 13:30 +0200
      Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2016-10-09 13:30 +0200
  Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 18:00 +0200

csiph-web