Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #173280 > unrolled thread

url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

Started byTony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com>
First post2016-10-07 20:10 +0200
Last post2016-10-26 18:00 +0200
Articles 20 on this page of 27 — 11 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user


Contents

  url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-07 20:10 +0200
    Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> - 2016-10-07 20:30 +0200
      Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. claude juif <claude.juif@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 20:40 +0200
        Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> - 2016-10-07 21:50 +0200
    Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according  to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-10-08 00:50 +0200
      Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according  to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. davidson@freevolt.org - 2016-10-08 01:00 +0200
      Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> - 2016-10-08 04:10 +0200
        Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. claude juif <claude.juif@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 17:30 +0200
          Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-08 17:40 +0200
          Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-08 17:40 +0200
            Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according  to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-10-08 20:10 +0200
    Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2016-10-09 13:20 +0200
      Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-09 13:30 +0200
        Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Lars Noodén <lars.nooden@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 13:40 +0200
        Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2016-10-09 13:40 +0200
          Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-09 15:10 +0200
            Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. claude juif <claude.juif@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 18:00 +0200
              Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-09 21:10 +0200
                Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. rhkramer@gmail.com - 2016-10-09 22:30 +0200
                  ifconfig question (recovered from hijacked thread ) Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com> - 2016-10-10 19:30 +0200
                  Linux source address selection (Was Re: url redirected in  chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx,  w3m, iceweasel.) Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2016-10-12 04:40 +0200
                    Re: Linux source address selection (Was Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2016-10-12 11:40 +0200
          Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2016-10-09 18:20 +0200
        Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 18:00 +0200
      Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com> - 2016-10-09 13:30 +0200
        Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to  ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2016-10-09 13:30 +0200
    Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel. Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 18:00 +0200

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →


#173280 — url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

FromTony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com>
Date2016-10-07 20:10 +0200
Subjecturl redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
Message-ID<spHKP-49t-47@gated-at.bofh.it>
I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media 
consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me.
Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm 
getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web",
If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page,
But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing 
has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder 
or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate 
anything untoward or fishy.
The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE.
Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though.

How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some 
browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I 
can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence?

tia
tony

-- 
http://tonybaldwin.me
all tony, all the time

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#173282

FromAnthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com>
Date2016-10-07 20:30 +0200
Message-ID<spI4a-4kf-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#173280
I can now also verify that the page loads fine n Dolphin browser on my 
android device.

On 10/07/2016 02:00 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media
> consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me.
> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm
> getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web",
> If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page,
> But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing
> has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder
> or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate
> anything untoward or fishy.
> The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE.
> Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though.
>
> How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some
> browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I
> can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence?
>
> tia
> tony
>

-- 
http://www.baldwinlinguas.com
translations, localization,
multilingual web development
EN, ES, FR, PT

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#173283

Fromclaude juif <claude.juif@gmail.com>
Date2016-10-07 20:40 +0200
Message-ID<spIdP-4nx-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#173282

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

2016-10-07 20:04 GMT+02:00 Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com>:

> I can now also verify that the page loads fine n Dolphin browser on my
> android device.
>
> On 10/07/2016 02:00 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>
>> I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media
>> consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me.
>> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm
>> getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web",
>> If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page,
>> But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing
>> has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder
>> or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate
>> anything untoward or fishy.
>> The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE.
>> Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though.
>>
>
Hi, it works well in my Chrome Browser.

May be you have some proxy between, or a misconfigured /etc/hosts entry.

Did you try to load it with all plugins disabled ?


>> How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some
>> browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I
>> can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence?
>>
>> tia
>> tony
>>
>>
> --
> http://www.baldwinlinguas.com
> translations, localization,
> multilingual web development
> EN, ES, FR, PT
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#173289

FromAnthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com>
Date2016-10-07 21:50 +0200
Message-ID<spJjA-537-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#173283

On 10/07/2016 02:32 PM, claude juif wrote:
>
>
> 2016-10-07 20:04 GMT+02:00 Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com
> <mailto:baldwinlinguas@gmx.com>>:
>
>     I can now also verify that the page loads fine n Dolphin browser on
>     my android device.
>
>     On 10/07/2016 02:00 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>
>         I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media
>         consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me.
>         Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm
>         getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web",
>         If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy
>         landing page,
>         But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and
>         nothing
>         has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an
>         intruder
>         or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to
>         indicate
>         anything untoward or fishy.
>         The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari,
>         or IE.
>         Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though.
>
>
> Hi, it works well in my Chrome Browser.
>
> May be you have some proxy between, or a misconfigured /etc/hosts entry.
>
> Did you try to load it with all plugins disabled ?

Thanks,
I use no proxy/ies, neither at home, nor on the remote server.
My brother, who brought the matter to my attention was also using chrome
. disabling my extensions doesn't seem to make any difference.
There appears no mention of the url in any of my hosts files (neither at 
home, nor on the server), nor anything that would redirect the IP 
address, since I can load other sites on the same server (and the 
myownsite.me domain) without troubles.
What else can I do?

>
>
>         How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in
>         some
>         browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and
>         how I
>         can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence?
>
>         tia
>         tony
>
>
>     --
>     http://www.baldwinlinguas.com
>     translations, localization,
>     multilingual web development
>     EN, ES, FR, PT
>
>

-- 
http://www.baldwinlinguas.com
translations, localization,
multilingual web development
EN, ES, FR, PT

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#173303 — Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

Fromdavidson@freevolt.org
Date2016-10-08 00:50 +0200
SubjectRe: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
Message-ID<spM7L-70p-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#173280
On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote:

> I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media 
> consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me.
> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm getting 
> redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web",
> If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page,
> But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has 
> changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any 
> such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate anything 
> untoward or fishy.
> The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE.
> Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though.
>
> How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some 
> browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I can 
> stop it or prevent future re-occurrence?

This problem sounds bizarre to me.

One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that
some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com) will point urls in
email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email provider
can log what you read).

For example, a link labeled

  http://playomatic.myownsite.me

will point to

  https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code]/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me

If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of
yours, then following such links in emails might result in unexpected
behaviour not unlike what you are seeing.

A shot in the dark, for what its worth.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#173307 — Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

Fromdavidson@freevolt.org
Date2016-10-08 01:00 +0200
SubjectRe: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
Message-ID<spMhs-749-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#173303
On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, davidson@freevolt.org wrote:

> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>
>> I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media 
>> consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me.
>> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm 
>> getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web",
>> If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page,
>> But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing has 
>> changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder or any 
>> such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate anything 
>> untoward or fishy.
>> The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE.
>> Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though.
>> 
>> How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some 
>> browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I can 
>> stop it or prevent future re-occurrence?
>
> This problem sounds bizarre to me.
>
> One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that
> some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com) will point urls in
> email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email provider
> can log what you read).
>
> For example, a link labeled
>
> http://playomatic.myownsite.me
>
> will point to
>
> https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code]/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me
>
> If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of
> yours, then following such links in emails might result in unexpected
> behaviour not unlike what you are seeing.
>
> A shot in the dark, for what its worth.

My point here, which I may not have made clear, is that when you test
the site in each browser, make sure you are really requesting
http://playomatic.myownsite.me, not the redirect some email provider
may have replaced it with.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#173312

FromAnthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com>
Date2016-10-08 04:10 +0200
Message-ID<spPfj-LZ-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#173303

On 10/07/2016 06:42 PM, davidson@freevolt.org wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>
>> I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media
>> consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me.
>> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm
>> getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web",
>> If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page,
>> But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing
>> has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder
>> or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate
>> anything untoward or fishy.
>> The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE.
>> Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though.
>>
>> How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some
>> browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I
>> can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence?
>
> This problem sounds bizarre to me.
>
> One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that
> some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com) will point urls in
> email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email provider
> can log what you read).

But I'm typing the url directly into the browser, and not clicking on a 
link in an e-mail.
Also, when I sign out of chrome/chromium-sync, it works fine again. so 
yeah, definitely something very odd going on.
>
> For example, a link labeled
>
>  http://playomatic.myownsite.me
>
> will point to
>
>  https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code]/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me
>
>
> If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of
> yours, then following such links in emails might result in unexpected
> behaviour not unlike what you are seeing.
>
> A shot in the dark, for what its worth.
>

-- 
http://www.baldwinlinguas.com
translations, localization,
multilingual web development
EN, ES, FR, PT

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#173319

Fromclaude juif <claude.juif@gmail.com>
Date2016-10-08 17:30 +0200
Message-ID<sq1Jv-ju-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#173312

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

2016-10-08 3:53 GMT+02:00 Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com>:

>
>
> On 10/07/2016 06:42 PM, davidson@freevolt.org wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media
>>> consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me.
>>> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm
>>> getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web",
>>> If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page,
>>> But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine, and nothing
>>> has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by an intruder
>>> or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to indicate
>>> anything untoward or fishy.
>>> The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror, Safari, or IE.
>>> Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone, though.
>>>
>>> How can I determine what's interfering with this page loading in some
>>> browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic, and how I
>>> can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence?
>>>
>>
>> This problem sounds bizarre to me.
>>
>> One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that
>> some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com) will point urls in
>> email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email provider
>> can log what you read).
>>
>
> But I'm typing the url directly into the browser, and not clicking on a
> link in an e-mail.
> Also, when I sign out of chrome/chromium-sync, it works fine again. so
> yeah, definitely something very odd going on.
>
>>
>> For example, a link labeled
>>
>>  http://playomatic.myownsite.me
>>
>> will point to
>>
>>  https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code]
>> /dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me
>> <https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/%5BSome-Alpha-Numeric-Code%5D/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me>
>>
>>
>> If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of
>> yours, then following such links in emails might result in unexpected
>> behaviour not unlike what you are seeing.
>>
>> A shot in the dark, for what its worth.
>>
>

Can you use the chrome developper tools to see what's going on ? (Press the
F12 key while chrome is open) Select the network tab, and type the url in
your address bar.
The network panel should show you what happens



>
>>
> --
> http://www.baldwinlinguas.com
> translations, localization,
> multilingual web development
> EN, ES, FR, PT
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#173320

FromTony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com>
Date2016-10-08 17:40 +0200
Message-ID<sq1Tc-my-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#173319

On 10/08/2016 11:28 AM, claude juif wrote:
>
> 2016-10-08 3:53 GMT+02:00 Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com
> <mailto:baldwinlinguas@gmx.com>>:
>
>
>
>     On 10/07/2016 06:42 PM, davidson@freevolt.org
>     <mailto:davidson@freevolt.org> wrote:
>
>         On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>
>             I have a little business card website up for my big
>             brother's media
>             consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me.
>             Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in
>             Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm
>             getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web",
>             If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy
>             landing page,
>             But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine,
>             and nothing
>             has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by
>             an intruder
>             or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to
>             indicate
>             anything untoward or fishy.
>             The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror,
>             Safari, or IE.
>             Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone,
>             though.
>
>             How can I determine what's interfering with this page
>             loading in some
>             browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic,
>             and how I
>             can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence?
>
>
>         This problem sounds bizarre to me.
>
>         One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that
>         some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com
>         <http://gmx.com>) will point urls in
>         email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email
>         provider
>         can log what you read).
>
>
>     But I'm typing the url directly into the browser, and not clicking
>     on a link in an e-mail.
>     Also, when I sign out of chrome/chromium-sync, it works fine again.
>     so yeah, definitely something very odd going on.
>
>
>         For example, a link labeled
>
>          http://playomatic.myownsite.me <http://playomatic.myownsite.me>
>
>         will point to
>
>          https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code]/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me
>         <https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/%5BSome-Alpha-Numeric-Code%5D/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me>
>
>
>         If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of
>         yours, then following such links in emails might result in
>         unexpected
>         behaviour not unlike what you are seeing.
>
>         A shot in the dark, for what its worth.


As soon as I type in the url, it goes to 
http://bridge.sf.admarketplace.net/bounce?click_id=1475940640200100010&m_width=1680&m_height=1050&b_width=624&b_height=860&b_top=5&b_left=33&in_iframe=0
whereas traceroute shows it going to my modem-> a local hub-> Comcast's 
DNS server in Boston, then to New York, then jumping to Frankfurt -> 
Munich, then the server I rent from Contabo which is in Munich, afaik.

Thanks,
Tony
>
>
-- 
http://tonybaldwin.me
all tony, all the time

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#173321

FromTony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com>
Date2016-10-08 17:40 +0200
Message-ID<sq1Tc-my-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#173319

On 10/08/2016 11:28 AM, claude juif wrote:
>
> 2016-10-08 3:53 GMT+02:00 Anthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com
> <mailto:baldwinlinguas@gmx.com>>:
>
>
>
>     On 10/07/2016 06:42 PM, davidson@freevolt.org
>     <mailto:davidson@freevolt.org> wrote:
>
>         On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>
>             I have a little business card website up for my big
>             brother's media
>             consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me.
>             Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in
>             Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm
>             getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web",
>             If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy
>             landing page,
>             But in all of Iceweasel, lynx, w3m, elinks it loads fine,
>             and nothing
>             has changed on my server (no redirect added to my vhost by
>             an intruder
>             or any such thing), also neither ping nor traceroute seem to
>             indicate
>             anything untoward or fishy.
>             The only thing I haven't tried is Epiphany, Konqueror,
>             Safari, or IE.
>             Oddly, it seems to work fine in chrome on my android phone,
>             though.
>
>             How can I determine what's interfering with this page
>             loading in some
>             browsers, and not others? or what's redirecting my traffic,
>             and how I
>             can stop it or prevent future re-occurrence?
>
>
>         This problem sounds bizarre to me.
>
>         One less-than-obvious conceivable factor that occurs to me is that
>         some webmail interfaces (looking at you, gmx.com
>         <http://gmx.com>) will point urls in
>         email text at creepy redirects (presumably so that your email
>         provider
>         can log what you read).
>
>
>     But I'm typing the url directly into the browser, and not clicking
>     on a link in an e-mail.
>     Also, when I sign out of chrome/chromium-sync, it works fine again.
>     so yeah, definitely something very odd going on.
>
>
>         For example, a link labeled
>
>          http://playomatic.myownsite.me <http://playomatic.myownsite.me>
>
>         will point to
>
>          https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/[Some-Alpha-Numeric-Code]/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me
>         <https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/%5BSome-Alpha-Numeric-Code%5D/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fplayomatic.myownsite.me>
>
>
>         If one of those redirects happens to be broken, through no fault of
>         yours, then following such links in emails might result in
>         unexpected
>         behaviour not unlike what you are seeing.
>
>         A shot in the dark, for what its worth.
>
>
>
> Can you use the chrome developper tools to see what's going on ? (Press
> the F12 key while chrome is open) Select the network tab, and type the
> url in your address bar.
> The network panel should show you what happens

That doesn't seem to tell me anything traceroute doesn't, except 
trqacerout doesn't get redirect to a Yahoo! search like chrome does,
but nothing I see there seems ot clarify WHY or HOW it's getting 
redirected, it's just showing me that it IS being led though some 
circolocuitous route to where it should not.

>
>
>
>
>
>     --
>     http://www.baldwinlinguas.com
>     translations, localization,
>     multilingual web development
>     EN, ES, FR, PT
>
>

-- 
http://tonybaldwin.me
all tony, all the time

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#173330 — Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

From<tomas@tuxteam.de>
Date2016-10-08 20:10 +0200
SubjectRe: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
Message-ID<sq4el-1UU-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#173321
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 11:35:21AM -0400, Tony Baldwin wrote:

[...]

> >Can you use the chrome developper tools to see what's going on ? (Press
> >the F12 key while chrome is open) Select the network tab, and type the
> >url in your address bar.
> >The network panel should show you what happens
> 
> That doesn't seem to tell me anything traceroute doesn't, except
> trqacerout doesn't get redirect to a Yahoo! search like chrome does,
> but nothing I see there seems ot clarify WHY or HOW it's getting
> redirected, it's just showing me that it IS being led though some
> circolocuitous route to where it should not.

A shot in the dark, but worth a try anyway: IPV4 vs IPV6?

But I'd rather suspect Chrome doing something weird to the URL before
resolving (or -- who knows! having its own built-in resolver).

Perhaps looking at the traffic with tcpdump/wireshark can give you
an idea.

Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlf5NeoACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZ+PQCeOsGFniEXtN/uNxh7xpHmc5jg
SG0AmgMz751oR58+BwBJEKN5RP60UsGK
=NsR2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#173345

FromRichard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz>
Date2016-10-09 13:20 +0200
Message-ID<sqkj7-3v1-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#173280
On 08/10/16 07:00, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> I have a little business card website up for my big brother's media
> consulting side-business at http://playomatic.myownsite.me.
> Now, at the moment, if I try to load it in Google-Chrome-Stable, I'm
> getting redirected to a yahoo! search for "create web",
> If I try to load it in the floss chromium, I get a spammy landing page,

This is probably a long shot ... is it a recent chrome/chromium? It
seems to work fine for me in jessie.

Just wondering if it sees a url that doesn't start with www, and ends
with a slightly unusual '.me', and tries to 'autocorrect'. But .me is a
country code TLD, not one of the new ones as I first thought, so it
shouldn't be that.

Richard

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#173346

FromTony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com>
Date2016-10-09 13:30 +0200
Message-ID<sqksO-3zs-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#173345

On 10/09/2016 07:23 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
> On 10/10/16 00:20, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>> What country is .me? here in th US, of course, it could be the State of
>> Maine.
>
> Montenegro, apparently. According to a quick web search ;-)
>
> Richard
>

Thanks, I was curious, couldn't think of anything, all the Ms I could 
think of were thins like Maroc, Moçambique, Macao, and the like, where 
.ma, .mc, .mo, or some such think would make more sense.
I kind of think Montenegro should be .Mn, really (or that for the US 
stat of  Minnesota).
Tony

-- 
http://tonybaldwin.me
all tony, all the time

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#173349

FromLars Noodén <lars.nooden@gmail.com>
Date2016-10-09 13:40 +0200
Message-ID<sqkCt-3Cr-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#173346
On 10/09/2016 02:28 PM, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/09/2016 07:23 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
>> On 10/10/16 00:20, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>>> What country is .me? here in th US, of course, it could be the State of
>>> Maine.
>>
>> Montenegro, apparently. According to a quick web search ;-)
>>
>> Richard
>>
> 
> Thanks, I was curious, couldn't think of anything, all the Ms I could
> think of were thins like Maroc, Moçambique, Macao, and the like, where
> .ma, .mc, .mo, or some such think would make more sense.
> I kind of think Montenegro should be .Mn, really (or that for the US
> stat of  Minnesota).
> Tony
> 

The complete list is all in ISO-3166.  It has two-letter codes as well
as three-letter codes.  ISO 639, in contrast, covers languages.  I'd
seen some sites mix them up.

Regards,
Lars

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#173350

FromRichard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz>
Date2016-10-09 13:40 +0200
Message-ID<sqkCu-3Cr-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#173346
On 10/10/16 00:28, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/09/2016 07:23 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
>> On 10/10/16 00:20, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>>> What country is .me? here in th US, of course, it could be the
>>> State of Maine.
>> 
>> Montenegro, apparently. According to a quick web search ;-)
>> 
>> Richard
>> 
> 
> Thanks, I was curious, couldn't think of anything, all the Ms I
> could think of were thins like Maroc, Moçambique, Macao, and the
> like, where .ma, .mc, .mo, or some such think would make more
> sense. I kind of think Montenegro should be .Mn, really (or that
> for the US stat of  Minnesota).

That's Mongolia :-)

It appears that Montenegro only came into existence (most recently) in
2006 - it was part of Yugoslavia, then 'Serbia and Montenegro'. So all
the 'good' codes were presumably taken.

I'm looking here:
http://www.domainsherpa.com/country-code-top-level-domains/

But we're getting a bit off-topic :-)

Richard

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#173352

FromTony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com>
Date2016-10-09 15:10 +0200
Message-ID<sqm1z-4zb-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#173350

On 10/09/2016 07:36 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
> On 10/10/16 00:28, Tony Baldwin wrote:

>
> But we're getting a bit off-topic :-)
>
> Richard
>

Indeed we are, but I thank you for humoring my curiosity.
Thanks,
Tony
-- 
http://tonybaldwin.me
all tony, all the time

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#173354

Fromclaude juif <claude.juif@gmail.com>
Date2016-10-09 18:00 +0200
Message-ID<sqoG5-66q-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#173352

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Are you logged in with a google account on that chrome/chromium ? By the
way, how did you install them ?

To resume :
On your debian computer, only for this website, you get redirect to ads
only with chrome/chromium ?

I would try these :

purge chromium and chrome.
Install chromium and go to your website. (do not log in before).

The only things i can think of is broken extension. I've never see this
happening, it's really strange. If that happens on windows i would have
say, search for malware and delete them.



2016-10-09 15:00 GMT+02:00 Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com>:

>
>
> On 10/09/2016 07:36 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
>
>> On 10/10/16 00:28, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>>
>
>
>> But we're getting a bit off-topic :-)
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
> Indeed we are, but I thank you for humoring my curiosity.
> Thanks,
>
> Tony
> --
> http://tonybaldwin.me
> all tony, all the time
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#173359

FromTony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com>
Date2016-10-09 21:10 +0200
Message-ID<sqrDX-89N-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#173354

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 10/09/2016 11:54 AM, claude juif wrote:
> Are you logged in with a google account on that chrome/chromium ? By 
> the way, how did you install them ?

I WAS logged into my google account when I had the problem,  in fact, 
but eventually determined that when I logged out, I could load the 
proper page for the url, oddly.
I installed chromium with aptitude, google-chrome-stable by downloading 
google's .deb pkg and doing sudo dpkg -i $said-google-pkg.deb
>
> To resume :
> On your debian computer, only for this website, you get redirect to 
> ads only with chrome/chromium ?

That is correct, Iceweasel, w3m, lynx and e-links all load the proper 
page/site.
Chrome and dolphin on my android phone do fine, as well, but apparently 
chrome on iOS (what my brother was using when he found the problem), 
does not.
>
> I would try these :
>
> purge chromium and chrome.
> Install chromium and go to your website. (do not log in before).
>
> The only things i can think of is broken extension. I've never see 
> this happening, it's really strange. If that happens on windows i 
> would have say, search for malware and delete them.
>
>
>
> 2016-10-09 15:00 GMT+02:00 Tony Baldwin <tonybaldwin@gmx.com 
> <mailto:tonybaldwin@gmx.com>>:
>
>
>
>     On 10/09/2016 07:36 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
>
>         On 10/10/16 00:28, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>
>
>
>         But we're getting a bit off-topic :-)
>
>         Richard
>
>
>     Indeed we are, but I thank you for humoring my curiosity.
>     Thanks,
>
>     Tony
>     -- 
>     http://tonybaldwin.me
>     all tony, all the time
>
>


-- 
http://tonybaldwin.me
all tony, all the time

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#173361 — Re: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.

Fromrhkramer@gmail.com
Date2016-10-09 22:30 +0200
SubjectRe: url redirected in chrome/chromium, but working fine, according to ping/traceroute, lynx, w3m, iceweasel.
Message-ID<sqsTo-mZ-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#173359
I'm not the OP, and I'm sort of piggybacking and going somewhat (or a lot?) 
OT, but I am curious about how old inet4 (right term?) and the new inet6 
addresses interact.

When I do ifconfig, I see that eth0 has both a 32 bit (e.g., 192.168.1.19) and 
an inet6 address assigned.

Can anybody point me to a fairly short document that explains things like 
which gets used under what circumstances, does one have precedence over the 
other, do they both use DNS, and similar things which might let me make sense 
of the situation?

On Sunday, October 09, 2016 03:02:25 PM Tony Baldwin wrote:
> On 10/09/2016 11:54 AM, claude juif wrote:
> > Are you logged in with a google account on that chrome/chromium ? By
> > the way, how did you install them ?
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#173407 — ifconfig question (recovered from hijacked thread )

FromAnthony Baldwin <baldwinlinguas@gmx.com>
Date2016-10-10 19:30 +0200
Subjectifconfig question (recovered from hijacked thread )
Message-ID<sqMyK-412-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#173361

On 10/09/2016 04:23 PM, rhkramer@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm not the OP, and I'm sort of piggybacking and going somewhat (or a lot?)
> OT, but I am curious about how old inet4 (right term?) and the new inet6
> addresses interact.
>
> When I do ifconfig, I see that eth0 has both a 32 bit (e.g., 192.168.1.19) and
> an inet6 address assigned.
>
> Can anybody point me to a fairly short document that explains things like
> which gets used under what circumstances, does one have precedence over the
> other, do they both use DNS, and similar things which might let me make sense
> of the situation?

Don't hijack another thread, send a new mail with an appropriate subject 
line like the one on this message. That way you're more likely to get 
the help you need, and it's just proper list edicate.

Good luck
tony (OP of the thread you tried to hijack)


-- 
http://www.baldwinlinguas.com
translations, localization,
multilingual web development
EN, ES, FR, PT

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user


csiph-web