Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #201482

Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium

Show all headers | View raw

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

On 20/10/18 11:16, arne wrote:
> While browsing on stock updated Debian stretch I get several times
> a day:
> 
> Secure Connection Failed
> 
> The connection to www.google.com was interrupted while the page was
> loading.
> 
> The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the 
> authenticity of the received data could not be verified.

Maybe OCSP ?

Google doesn't seem to care for OCSP, so that could be a problem.

If you enforce OCSP to fail if it can't get an answer, then you will
likely see problems with Google sites ... regularly.  Other sites
aren't so uncaring about OCSP as Google whom think they own the online
world.

Google imposes all sorts of things for *their* own greater good,
thinking they know best all the time; it can be very frustrating and I
wish they would butt out.  Consequently, the chances of me using
Chrome or related browsers is quite low and I would definitely not use
them for my default, ever.

I do use Pale Moon, don't know exactly what the connection is with
"basilisk-browser" (other thread).  I also use Firefox and Tor Browser
Bundle.  On the whole, I am fairly happy with Pale Moon.  Firefox,
partly driven by Google's Chrome, also make decisions that I'm not
happy with, hence the use of Pale Moon predominantly.


Cheers
A.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEAREIAB0WIQTJAoMHtC6YydLfjUOoFmvLt+/i+wUCW8shTgAKCRCoFmvLt+/i
+9IXAP4vx1FYwxEBl80PjD7IRp6fC5TfMBLtzz0f8hh31TrNegEA3n23t7ZrZv6X
3D93I7jQFFCIt55ffOff6yqGLgXbGdo=
=8geS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium arne <sp113438@telfort.nl> - 2018-10-20 02:40 +0200
  Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-10-20 08:30 +0200
    Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2018-10-20 09:30 +0200
      Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-10-20 09:30 +0200
        Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium arne <sp113438@telfort.nl> - 2018-11-30 23:10 +0100
          Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-12-01 08:40 +0100
  Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2018-10-20 14:40 +0200

csiph-web