Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #201461

Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium

From mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium
Date 2018-10-20 09:30 +0200
Message-ID <wKTRT-4Rd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <wKNt8-XD-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <wKSVQ-4jQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 2018-10-20 07:22, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 02:16:57AM +0200, arne wrote:
>> By-passed my proxies, did not help.
>> 
>> Those sites all load OK in Chromium, but I do not like this browser.
>> 
>> Strange thing, when I retry 2-80 times the pages get loaded.
>> 
>> I use Tab Mix Plus Mozilla add-on to reload every 2 seconds until the
>> pages load.
>> 
>> 
>> In short:
>> Secure Connection Failed
>> 
>> Any ideas what can be the solution?
> 
> A better question would be - what's the actual problem.
> 'Secure Connection Failed' can refer to many things, such as
> certificate/domain mismatch, certificate expiration, wrong TLS protocol
> version etc.
> Any Modern Browser™ hides these details from you, so Firefox (for
> instance) itself is hardly suited for the troubleshooting.
> 
> So I propose this for starters:
> 
> openssl s_client -connect www.google.com:443
> 
> Reco

Is this something about google enforcing https everywhere ?

mick
-- 
Key ID    4BFEBB31

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium arne <sp113438@telfort.nl> - 2018-10-20 02:40 +0200
  Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-10-20 08:30 +0200
    Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2018-10-20 09:30 +0200
      Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-10-20 09:30 +0200
        Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium arne <sp113438@telfort.nl> - 2018-11-30 23:10 +0100
          Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-12-01 08:40 +0100
  Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2018-10-20 14:40 +0200

csiph-web