Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #201462

Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium

From Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium
Date 2018-10-20 09:30 +0200
Message-ID <wKTRU-4Rd-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <wKNt8-XD-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <wKSVQ-4jQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <wKTRT-4Rd-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


	Hi.

On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 08:20:16AM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2018-10-20 07:22, Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> > 
> > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 02:16:57AM +0200, arne wrote:
> > > By-passed my proxies, did not help.
> > > 
> > > Those sites all load OK in Chromium, but I do not like this browser.
> > > 
> > > Strange thing, when I retry 2-80 times the pages get loaded.
> > > 
> > > I use Tab Mix Plus Mozilla add-on to reload every 2 seconds until the
> > > pages load.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > In short:
> > > Secure Connection Failed
> > > 
> > > Any ideas what can be the solution?
> > 
> > A better question would be - what's the actual problem.
> > 'Secure Connection Failed' can refer to many things, such as
> > certificate/domain mismatch, certificate expiration, wrong TLS protocol
> > version etc.
> > Any Modern Browser™ hides these details from you, so Firefox (for
> > instance) itself is hardly suited for the troubleshooting.
> > 
> > So I propose this for starters:
> > 
> > openssl s_client -connect www.google.com:443
> > 
> > Reco
> 
> Is this something about google enforcing https everywhere ?

That's a part of the problem, of course. Plain HTTP does not have these
kind of problems (but there are another ones and HTTPS was invented to
solve these).
But I don't have any useful information (yet) to even start
suspecting something.

Reco

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium arne <sp113438@telfort.nl> - 2018-10-20 02:40 +0200
  Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-10-20 08:30 +0200
    Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2018-10-20 09:30 +0200
      Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-10-20 09:30 +0200
        Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium arne <sp113438@telfort.nl> - 2018-11-30 23:10 +0100
          Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-12-01 08:40 +0100
  Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2018-10-20 14:40 +0200

csiph-web