Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #201462
| From | Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium |
| Date | 2018-10-20 09:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wKTRU-4Rd-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <wKNt8-XD-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <wKSVQ-4jQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <wKTRT-4Rd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi. On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 08:20:16AM +0100, mick crane wrote: > On 2018-10-20 07:22, Reco wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 02:16:57AM +0200, arne wrote: > > > By-passed my proxies, did not help. > > > > > > Those sites all load OK in Chromium, but I do not like this browser. > > > > > > Strange thing, when I retry 2-80 times the pages get loaded. > > > > > > I use Tab Mix Plus Mozilla add-on to reload every 2 seconds until the > > > pages load. > > > > > > > > > In short: > > > Secure Connection Failed > > > > > > Any ideas what can be the solution? > > > > A better question would be - what's the actual problem. > > 'Secure Connection Failed' can refer to many things, such as > > certificate/domain mismatch, certificate expiration, wrong TLS protocol > > version etc. > > Any Modern Browser™ hides these details from you, so Firefox (for > > instance) itself is hardly suited for the troubleshooting. > > > > So I propose this for starters: > > > > openssl s_client -connect www.google.com:443 > > > > Reco > > Is this something about google enforcing https everywhere ? That's a part of the problem, of course. Plain HTTP does not have these kind of problems (but there are another ones and HTTPS was invented to solve these). But I don't have any useful information (yet) to even start suspecting something. Reco
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium arne <sp113438@telfort.nl> - 2018-10-20 02:40 +0200
Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-10-20 08:30 +0200
Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2018-10-20 09:30 +0200
Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-10-20 09:30 +0200
Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium arne <sp113438@telfort.nl> - 2018-11-30 23:10 +0100
Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-12-01 08:40 +0100
Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2018-10-20 14:40 +0200
csiph-web