Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #182019
| From | Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again |
| Date | 2017-06-10 16:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tQPyN-8dm-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <tQtoC-2MZ-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tQtRD-3bI-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tQuul-3qu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tQEam-186-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tQP5L-7L5-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Fungi4All <fungilife@protonmail.com> wrote:
> UTC Time: June 10, 2017 2:13 AM
>
> From: joel.rees@gmail.com
>
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> wrote:
>> Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, The Wanderer a écrit :
>>> Disagreed. This results in sending extra copies to people who are
>>> subscribed to the list, which is incorrect.
>>
>> Not if the list is properly configured.
>>
>> Debian's lists are badly configured, it results in burden to all users,
>> but the users should reject that burden. I do.
>>
>> I will not answer Gene's message, he obviously missed the whole point of
>> my mail.
>> Nicolas George
>
> And Now Google Doesn't Think Users Should Ever Set Headers.
> Progress is progress.
>
>
> Progress in a society comes when they collectively pursue in common
> something
> that would improve their lives and conditions. If the few and powerful
> coerce or
> blackmail a society to move a certain direction because that advances the
> interests
> of the few I wouldn't dare call this progress. Rarely in history did such
> moves lasted
> and stabilized, as for every action there is a reaction. Just give it some
> time and
> the vast majority of the world will be really happy to see google/fb/ms
> collapse
> and vanish. That may be progress, being without the pests.
>
> Would you call android and win10 progress? I hope not. Vehicles were
> progress
> over horses and carriages in some respects, people walking and one in
> ten thousands being driven in a Rolls Royce where the passengers were
> covered
> and the driver was outside was not progress. Model A was progress at
> a cost.
>
> Progress is not made by following rulers and those in power, it comes
> from the dialectic of resisting and reacting to power and oligarchy.
>
> Joel Rees
>
>
> (AK)
Yeah.
Progress is progress.
ahem. Sorry. I guess I forgot something.
{irony}Progress is progress.{end-irony}
--
Joel Rees
One of these days I'll get someone to pay me
to design a language that combines the best of Forth and C.
Then I'll be able to leap wide instruction sets with a single #ifdef,
run faster than a speeding infinite loop with a #define,
and stop all integer size bugs with a bare cast.
More of my delusions:
http://reiisi.blogspot.com/2017/05/do-not-pay-modern-danegeld-ransomware.html
http://reiisi.blogspot.jp/p/novels-i-am-writing.html
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
NTP.conf pool vs server ray <ray@aarden.us> - 2017-06-07 15:20 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-06-07 15:30 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-06-07 16:50 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-06-07 16:40 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-06-07 17:00 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2017-06-07 17:00 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-06-07 17:10 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Joshua Schaeffer <jschaeffer0922@gmail.com> - 2017-06-07 17:30 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-06-07 17:50 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2017-06-07 18:10 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2017-06-07 17:20 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-06-08 01:10 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2017-06-08 14:30 +0200
Re: https_port "Adiel Plasencia Herrera" <adielp@estereocentro.icrt.cu> - 2017-06-08 14:50 +0200
Re: https_port Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2017-06-08 15:30 +0200
Re: https_port Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2017-06-08 17:00 +0200
Re: https_port "Adiel Plasencia Herrera" <adielp@estereocentro.icrt.cu> - 2017-06-08 17:20 +0200
Re: https_port Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2017-06-08 17:30 +0200
Re: https_port Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2017-06-08 17:40 +0200
Re: https_port Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2017-06-08 17:50 +0200
Re: https_port "Adiel Plasencia Herrera" <adielp@estereocentro.icrt.cu> - 2017-06-08 18:00 +0200
Re: https_port Jim Ohlstein <jim@mailman-hosting.com> - 2017-06-08 19:10 +0200
Re: https_port Charlie Kravetz <cjk@teamcharliesangels.com> - 2017-06-09 16:40 +0200
Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again (was: https_port) Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2017-06-09 16:50 +0200
Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again (was: https_port) Fungi4All <fungilife@protonmail.com> - 2017-06-09 17:20 +0200
Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-06-09 17:20 +0200
Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2017-06-09 18:00 +0200
Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2017-06-09 21:20 +0200
Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com> - 2017-06-10 04:20 +0200
Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again Fungi4All <fungilife@protonmail.com> - 2017-06-10 16:00 +0200
Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com> - 2017-06-10 16:30 +0200
Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again Fungi4All <fungilife@protonmail.com> - 2017-06-10 18:00 +0200
Re: Reply-to-all or reply-to-list again (was: https_port) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-06-09 17:30 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-06-08 16:10 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2017-06-07 18:10 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-06-07 18:30 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-06-11 18:00 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2017-06-11 19:30 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2017-06-08 08:40 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-06-08 09:20 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-06-08 15:40 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Jim Ohlstein <jim@mailman-hosting.com> - 2017-06-07 18:40 +0200
Re: NTP.conf pool vs server Kushal Kumaran <kushal@locationd.net> - 2017-06-07 17:00 +0200
csiph-web