Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth

Path	csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Joe <joe@jretrading.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth
Date	Sat, 23 Apr 2016 11:30:02 +0200
Message-ID	<rr230-Ri-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rqX3j-5ku-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rr0DU-852-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Sat Apr 23 09:24:13 2016
Old-Return-Path	<joe@jretrading.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-5.5 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, GMAIL=1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MDO_CABLE_TV3=0.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -6.1
Organization	JRE Trading Ltd
X-Mailer	Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Mailing-List	<debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/706508
List-ID	<debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20160423102357.69f3cc6f@jresid.jretrading.com
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	26
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:23:57 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<20160423102357.69f3cc6f@jresid.jretrading.com>
X-Original-References	<E1atoEM-0002JN-47@dalton.invalid> <20160423105308.7c45c8b220014ac9b4492f77@gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.user:167013

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:53:08 +0300
Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> wrote:

> 	Hi.
> 
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 20:27:38 -0700
> peter@easthope.ca wrote:
> 
> > According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluetooth ,
> > Bluetooth was "... originally conceived as a wireless alternative 
> > to RS-232 data cables."  Therefore TCP/IP inside PPP on a 
> > Bluetooth connection is hypthetically possible.
> > 
> > Has anyone tried it with a debian system on one end at least?  
> 
> I have to use the thing on a regular basis. Connection speed is
> turtle-slow by today's standards, 
> 

If you need lots of bandwidth, there's wifi. 'Proper' serial equipment
typically does not go higher than 115kBd, and most wired serial
applications need much less than that. Sony's camera control protocol
at 562.5kBd is very unusual, and a pig to route wirelessly.

-- 
Joe

Thread

TCP/IP over Bluetooth peter@easthope.ca - 2016-04-23 06:10 +0200
  Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth shawn wilson <ag4ve.us@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 06:40 +0200
    Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 07:10 +0200
      Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 09:40 +0200
        Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 13:20 +0200
          Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2016-04-23 14:00 +0200
            Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-04-23 14:20 +0200
            Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 14:40 +0200
              Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 14:50 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 15:10 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-04-23 16:40 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 19:10 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2016-04-23 19:30 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-04-23 20:00 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 21:20 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-04-23 22:10 +0200
                Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP  over Bluetooth) cbannister@slingshot.co.nz - 2016-04-27 10:40 +0200
                Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re:  TCP/IP over Bluetooth) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-04-27 11:00 +0200
                Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re:  TCP/IP over Bluetooth) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-04-27 11:20 +0200
                Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth) Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2016-04-27 11:40 +0200
                Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re:  TCP/IP over Bluetooth) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-04-27 11:50 +0200
                Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-27 14:20 +0200
                Re: Is running spamassin on a home server a waste? (was ... Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-04-27 14:50 +0200
                Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-04-23 21:10 +0200
              Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2016-04-23 15:50 +0200
  Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 10:00 +0200
    Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2016-04-23 11:30 +0200
      Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 12:30 +0200
        Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth shawn wilson <ag4ve.us@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 13:30 +0200
  Re: TCP/IP over Bluetooth Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2016-04-23 13:30 +0200

csiph-web