Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #231381

Re: "Run fsck manually"..?

Path csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: "Run fsck manually"..?
Date Wed, 03 Feb 2021 22:00:02 +0100
Message-ID <BExpM-59a-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <BEe3M-1Zq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BEfsR-2Ix-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <BEhEm-4ho-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <BEpBU-w8-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <BEsT7-2Aw-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <BEtcu-2GJ-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <BEwDn-4Sd-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Wed Feb 3 20:57:22 2021
Old-Return-Path <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5.5
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccf.org; s=mimecast; t=1612385822; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xYMO1Ak1SJSDegWJpykKphGM5npADRg0mU07EzA8m2o=; b=c5aiQXxOiAnioWTtU+7RJCvSaUjlYnlCw5YFhYwHObhUx7mVNyVScfnHl4eGn9ukJUj3Jj 3i7Y2WrQqxGdOy6t7br1zganXjgGqAsoXIDWve2ha0GPf9gFdaes7aCAzqvfPvSUXe5r0y rpdanhnYDKK6Os8hBQFgUdQOi0WiGRU=
X-Mc-Unique eWryzP0vOe-zBOtzze7LUw-2
Mail-Followup-To debian-user@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version 1.0
User-Agent Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Cfilter-Loop Reflected
Authentication-Results relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA51A83 smtp.mailfrom=wooledg@eeg.ccf.org
X-Mimecast-Originator eeg.ccf.org
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Disposition inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding quoted-printable
X-Mailing-List <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/771849
List-ID <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20210203205658.GU10572@eeg.ccf.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 55
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Wed, 3 Feb 2021 15:56:58 -0500
X-Original-Message-ID <20210203205658.GU10572@eeg.ccf.org>
X-Original-References <08ad8f59b0e76afafb91fe6ad7e51373.squirrel@dragon.rumormillnews.com> <20210203014154.GE3712@bitfolk.com> <20210203040130.GA28595@axis.corp> <20210203123225.GR10572@eeg.ccf.org> <20210203160242.GA5608@axis.corp> <20210203162438.GT10572@eeg.ccf.org> <20210203200604.GB5608@axis.corp>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.user:231381

Show key headers only | View raw


On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 02:06:04PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> >From foo/main/init where foo is
> $ unmkinitramfs /boot/initrd.img foo/

Interesting....  I used locate --regex to find where this is coming
from, and it seems there's a copy in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/init
which I'm guessing is what gets installed as init inside the initrd.

/usr/share/initramfs-tools/init is from the initramfs-tools-core
package which appears to come from Debian itself (according to
the copyright file), having been forked from Ubuntu's version.

A google search for "linux fsck.mode=force" led me indirectly to the
systemd-fsck man page.  This one tells me that fsck.mode= is an option
supported by systemd-fsck with the values auto, force or skip.  Debian's
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/init script appears to be using a superset
of these values, including your forcefsck alias.

Putting these clues all together is tricky for me because nothing is
really spelled out clearly.  Near as I can manage to guess, Debian's
initrd init script parses the kernel command line and looks for these
fsck-ish options, applies them during the initrd stage, and then...
then, I don't know what happens.

There is still no clear end-user-comprehensible documentation that says
how to make fsck happen on the next boot.

> > What is the "normal mechanism"?  Where is it documented?
> 
> https://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub/grub.html

(I told you guys how my email is being mangled....)

> I'm guessing the comment is a signature. §15.2 outlines the grubenv
> method. As Stefan mentioned, grubenv is designed to remain static,
> and grub-editenv carefully alters its contents. Configuring Grub
> uses /etc/grub.d/00_header and the variables in /etc/default/grub to
> write the code at the top of /boot/grub/grub.cfg for juggling the
> boot selection.
> 
> You start all this off by editing /etc/default/grub: GRUB_DEFAULT=0 →
> GRUB_DEFAULT=saved    and running   grub-set-default 0. Then:
> 
> $ head -c 72 /boot/grub/grubenv ; echo
> # GRUB Environment Block
> saved_entry=0
> #################################
> $ 
> 
> # grub-reboot 'fsck>fsck'

At this point I give up.  I don't know where this "fsck>fsck" argument
comes from or how you use it.  It's definitely not in the grub-reboot
man page.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

"Run fsck manually"..? "hobie of RMN" <hobie@rumormillnews.com> - 2021-02-03 01:20 +0100
  Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Jessica Litwin <jessica@litw.in> - 2021-02-03 01:20 +0100
    Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-02-03 01:30 +0100
      Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Jeremy Andrews <thejeremy.net@gmail.com> - 2021-02-03 02:20 +0100
        Re: "Run fsck manually"..? "hobie of RMN" <hobie@rumormillnews.com> - 2021-02-03 02:50 +0100
  Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2021-02-03 02:50 +0100
    Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2021-02-03 03:40 +0100
      [SOLVED} Re: "Run fsck manually"..? "hobie of RMN" <hobie@rumormillnews.com> - 2021-02-03 05:50 +0100
    Re: "Run fsck manually"..? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-02-03 05:10 +0100
      Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2021-02-03 09:40 +0100
      Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2021-02-03 13:40 +0100
        Re: "Run fsck manually"..? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-02-03 17:10 +0100
          Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2021-02-03 17:30 +0100
            Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-02-03 17:40 +0100
            Re: "Run fsck manually"..? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-02-03 21:10 +0100
              Re: "Run fsck manually"..? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2021-02-03 22:00 +0100
                Re: "Run fsck manually"..? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-02-04 02:10 +0100

csiph-web