Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.project > #13785

Re: a Constitutional interpretation question

From Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Newsgroups linux.debian.project
Subject Re: a Constitutional interpretation question
Date 2025-04-10 01:20 +0200
Message-ID <KzMS5-cnYh-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <Kyxs5-bxqJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <Kzh1T-c33Z-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KzsJH-caBH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KzBWF-cgPy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KzIv7-cl0R-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 11:31:24AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> 
> Obviously Kurt has the final say, but if he were to ask me my opinion,
> that's what I'd tell him.

Is there a need for me to actually make a ruling, or is this just a
theoretic question? I prefer not to make a ruling unless it's actually
needed. I'm likely to agree that the TC does not have that power.

Kurt

Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

a Constitutional interpretation question (was: Why Debian is dying) "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-09 20:20 +0200
  Re: a Constitutional interpretation question Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2025-04-09 20:40 +0200
    Re: a Constitutional interpretation question "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-09 23:10 +0200
      Re: a Constitutional interpretation question Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2025-04-10 19:00 +0200
    Re: a Constitutional interpretation question Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> - 2025-04-10 01:20 +0200
    Re: a Constitutional interpretation question Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org> - 2025-04-10 17:00 +0200

csiph-web