Re: a Constitutional interpretation question

From	Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.project
Subject	Re: a Constitutional interpretation question
Date	2025-04-18 09:20 +0200
Message-ID	<KCOb0-emWC-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(6 earlier) <Kzh1T-c33Z-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KzsJH-caBH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KzBWF-cgPy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <KzDF7-ci07-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <KzFdT-cj55-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	Private

Show all headers | View raw

]] "G. Branden Robinson" 

>> But Sean is right that this is a view that multiple TCs have 
>> expressed
>> on multiple occasions.
>
> Acknowledged.  I would then simply urge the current TC to keep 
> in mind
> that this limitation is one that they have _chosen_, not one 
> that has
> been imposed on them.  With luck, the distinction will not 
> become
> important soon, if ever.

No, it's not something the TC has chosen.  See
https://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2016/10/msg00060.html  and 
the
reply from the secretary,
https://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2016/10/msg00067.html .

-- 
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are

Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: a Constitutional interpretation question (was: Why Debian is dying) Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-04-09 15:30 +0200
  Re: a Constitutional interpretation question (was: Why Debian is dying) "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-09 17:10 +0200
    Re: a Constitutional interpretation question (was: Why Debian is dying) Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-04-09 20:40 +0200
    Re: a Constitutional interpretation question Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> - 2025-04-18 09:20 +0200

csiph-web