Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #13800
| From | "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: a Constitutional interpretation question |
| Date | 2025-04-15 18:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <KBQRz-dJBx-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <KzYJz-cvlY-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <KA4vD-cznz-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <KBqDM-ds2a-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <KBxlU-dwsP-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <KBQHT-dJxT-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
At 2025-04-15T16:45:40+0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > I think this is because there's a substantial contingent in Debian who > "hate politics". They see us "doing politics" and dislike us for it. > They think think Debian can avoid politics (spoiler: it's a project of > thousands of humans, we can't) and therefore they think the drama is > the fault of whoever is complaining. > > In these circumstances it is hardly surprising that we have some teams > that are well-known to be dysfunctional and toxic, but which nothing > is ever done about. Anyone who tries to take them on gets punished, > because taking on toxicity is by definition political. > > I wish we could get *better* at doing politics. If we did it better, > we would have much a nicer environment *and* we would probably spend a > lot less emotional energy on the politics, overall. I vigorously endorse these observations (and the rest of your message). The price of cowardice is to be governed by bullies. Regards, Branden
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: a Constitutional interpretation question Gerardo Ballabio <gerardo.ballabio@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 14:00 +0200
Re: a Constitutional interpretation question Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-04-10 20:10 +0200
Re: a Constitutional interpretation question "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-10 21:30 +0200
Re: a Constitutional interpretation question Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org> - 2025-04-11 13:20 +0200
Re: a Constitutional interpretation question Gerardo Ballabio <gerardo.ballabio@gmail.com> - 2025-04-14 14:00 +0200
Re: a Constitutional interpretation question Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2025-04-14 21:10 +0200
Re: a Constitutional interpretation question Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-04-15 17:50 +0200
Re: a Constitutional interpretation question "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2025-04-15 18:00 +0200
Re: a Constitutional interpretation question Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-04-16 01:00 +0200
Re: a Constitutional interpretation question Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org> - 2025-04-17 00:20 +0200
Re: a Constitutional interpretation question Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2025-04-16 03:20 +0200
csiph-web