Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12506 > unrolled thread

khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python

Contents

  khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org> - 2020-04-23 19:00 +0200
    Re: khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2020-04-23 19:10 +0200
      Re: khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-23 19:10 +0200
        Re: khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-04-23 19:20 +0200
        Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2020-04-23 23:40 +0200
          Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-04-24 00:00 +0200
            Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2020-04-24 02:30 +0200
              Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-04-24 03:00 +0200
                Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2020-04-24 03:20 +0200
      Re: khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-23 19:10 +0200

#12506 — khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:05:57 +0200
Source: khard
Architecture: source
Version: 0.16.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Python Team <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org>
Closes: 942416
Changes:
 khard (0.16.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream version 0.16.1 (Closes: #942416)
   * move the package to Debian Python Team
   * update B-D, add:
     - python3-sphinx-autodoc-typehints
     - python3-sphinx-autoapi
     - python3-astroids
   * docs: remove AUTHORS file
   * khard.examples: remove misc/khard
   * khard.doc-base: update index path
   * update patches
   * bump Standards-Version to 4.5.0
Checksums-Sha1:
 5d118c0de53fbf531bb6c64e945afc9aa2ff5479 1680 khard_0.16.1-1.dsc
 236c06ad9c4ef2629617772cdccf4dd55546b86b 577538 khard_0.16.1.orig.tar.gz
 4da10c05179540344d6a55d0b03d877cc7ae008f 4964 khard_0.16.1-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 99436155dda2dcb5b00e3eedac729f9c2bbaa5b27a181f05a7b303dfa1849d81 1680 khard_0.16.1-1.dsc
 9a50273bc827da99afc4dc8840be02dc37a22c2bfc88a04ed348f60389f14f2e 577538 khard_0.16.1.orig.tar.gz
 b2b8d00529cf4affcf74433b02728d25496802f65e3f4c0dc7ac0eaa7d26ad38 4964 khard_0.16.1-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 b2f4d2430201b15533daef4ccaded2e8 1680 utils optional khard_0.16.1-1.dsc
 2d17f791b46ae6fb26ee820495084363 577538 utils optional khard_0.16.1.orig.tar.gz
 513a09f3e14f73b8d8e72a35876e216d 4964 utils optional khard_0.16.1-1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQR6zeIsS8L0XLQfqiQBpfxHUdFE8AUCXqG/4QAKCRABpfxHUdFE
8Kz0AP9bV/BlefuTLkF/Voj+lPLTxFJkfDszr0No/UCfmle7HAEAvAmbhESrLtCS
t1WtFBITZJmYC0m7BMGC2i4Mc3+H+QY=
=nBwe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#12507

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 12:51 PM Debian FTP Masters
<ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Accepted:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Format: 1.8
> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:05:57 +0200
> Source: khard
> Architecture: source
> Version: 0.16.1-1
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: medium
> Maintainer: Debian Python Team <debian-python@lists.debian.org>

this is not the right team and/or email address

since it's in PAPT you need to use :"Python Applications Packaging
Team <python-apps-team@lists.alioth.debian.org>"

please fix this package and todoman (and any other you may be working
on that had the same issue)
> Changed-By: Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org>
> Closes: 942416
> Changes:
>  khard (0.16.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>    * New upstream version 0.16.1 (Closes: #942416)
>    * move the package to Debian Python Team
>    * update B-D, add:
>      - python3-sphinx-autodoc-typehints
>      - python3-sphinx-autoapi
>      - python3-astroids
>    * docs: remove AUTHORS file
>    * khard.examples: remove misc/khard
>    * khard.doc-base: update index path
>    * update patches
>    * bump Standards-Version to 4.5.0
> Checksums-Sha1:
>  5d118c0de53fbf531bb6c64e945afc9aa2ff5479 1680 khard_0.16.1-1.dsc
>  236c06ad9c4ef2629617772cdccf4dd55546b86b 577538 khard_0.16.1.orig.tar.gz
>  4da10c05179540344d6a55d0b03d877cc7ae008f 4964 khard_0.16.1-1.debian.tar.xz
> Checksums-Sha256:
>  99436155dda2dcb5b00e3eedac729f9c2bbaa5b27a181f05a7b303dfa1849d81 1680 khard_0.16.1-1.dsc
>  9a50273bc827da99afc4dc8840be02dc37a22c2bfc88a04ed348f60389f14f2e 577538 khard_0.16.1.orig.tar.gz
>  b2b8d00529cf4affcf74433b02728d25496802f65e3f4c0dc7ac0eaa7d26ad38 4964 khard_0.16.1-1.debian.tar.xz
> Files:
>  b2f4d2430201b15533daef4ccaded2e8 1680 utils optional khard_0.16.1-1.dsc
>  2d17f791b46ae6fb26ee820495084363 577538 utils optional khard_0.16.1.orig.tar.gz
>  513a09f3e14f73b8d8e72a35876e216d 4964 utils optional khard_0.16.1-1.debian.tar.xz
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iHUEARYKAB0WIQR6zeIsS8L0XLQfqiQBpfxHUdFE8AUCXqG/4QAKCRABpfxHUdFE
> 8Kz0AP9bV/BlefuTLkF/Voj+lPLTxFJkfDszr0No/UCfmle7HAEAvAmbhESrLtCS
> t1WtFBITZJmYC0m7BMGC2i4Mc3+H+QY=
> =nBwe
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
>


-- 
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12508

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Note that changing the address triggers a lintian warning: 

W: khard source: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure Python Applications Packaging Team <python-apps-team@lists.alioth.debian.org>

-- 
Félix

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12510

On Thursday, April 23, 2020 1:06:42 PM EDT Félix Sipma wrote:
> Note that changing the address triggers a lintian warning:
> 
> W: khard source: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure Python
> Applications Packaging Team <python-apps-team@lists.alioth.debian.org>

Python Applications Packaging Team <python-apps-team@lists.alioth.debian.org> 
is correct.

Scott K

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12515 — Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning

This warning was added to Lintian today, after being requested in 
#958182.  It appears on thousands of packages:
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12516 — Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning

On Thursday, April 23, 2020 5:21:49 PM EDT Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> This warning was added to Lintian today, after being requested in
> #958182.  It appears on thousands of packages:
> https://lintian.debian.org/tags/mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructu
> re.html

Thanks.  I mailed the bug to point out this tag is currently problematic.

Scott K

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12517 — Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 20-04-23 17 h 54, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, April 23, 2020 5:21:49 PM EDT Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
>> This warning was added to Lintian today, after being requested in
>> #958182.  It appears on thousands of packages:
>> https://lintian.debian.org/tags/mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructu
>> re.html
> 
> Thanks.  I mailed the bug to point out this tag is currently problematic.

FWIW, I proposed we merge the DPMT and the PAPT a few months ago [1] and
migrate to team+python@tracker.debian.org.

That would also solve the current issue with lintian :)

[1]:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/-/merge_requests/10

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org
  ⠈⠳⣄

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12518 — Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning

On April 24, 2020 12:26:27 AM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau" <pollo@debian.org> wrote:
>On 20-04-23 17 h 54, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> On Thursday, April 23, 2020 5:21:49 PM EDT Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
>>> This warning was added to Lintian today, after being requested in
>>> #958182.  It appears on thousands of packages:
>>>
>https://lintian.debian.org/tags/mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructu
>>> re.html
>> 
>> Thanks.  I mailed the bug to point out this tag is currently
>problematic.
>
>FWIW, I proposed we merge the DPMT and the PAPT a few months ago [1]
>and
>migrate to team+python@tracker.debian.org.
>
>That would also solve the current issue with lintian :)
>
>[1]:
>https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/-/merge_requests/10

And I don't think the response was particularly positive.  My recollection was that there's a preference for two teams because packages and modules have different needs.

I don't think we should let an artificial sense of urgency because lintian push us in to anything (apologies if I'm remembering the wrong instance of this being suggested - it's happened before).

Scott K

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12519 — Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 20-04-23 20 h 52, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> 
> 
> On April 24, 2020 12:26:27 AM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau" <pollo@debian.org> wrote:
>> On 20-04-23 17 h 54, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> On Thursday, April 23, 2020 5:21:49 PM EDT Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
>>>> This warning was added to Lintian today, after being requested in
>>>> #958182.  It appears on thousands of packages:
>>>>
>> https://lintian.debian.org/tags/mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructu
>>>> re.html
>>>
>>> Thanks.  I mailed the bug to point out this tag is currently
>> problematic.
>>
>> FWIW, I proposed we merge the DPMT and the PAPT a few months ago [1]
>> and
>> migrate to team+python@tracker.debian.org.
>>
>> That would also solve the current issue with lintian :)
>>
>> [1]:
>> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/-/merge_requests/10
> 
> And I don't think the response was particularly positive.  My recollection was that there's a preference for two teams because packages and modules have different needs.

Hmm, from the discussions we had on the mailing list and on Salsa the
feedback was mainly positive actually.

Happy to talk some more about it either on Salsa or on the ML:

https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/10/msg00021.html

> 
> I don't think we should let an artificial sense of urgency because lintian push us in to anything (apologies if I'm remembering the wrong instance of this being suggested - it's happened before).

Agreed :)

Sorry for disrupting this thread.

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org
  ⠈⠳⣄

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12509

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Sorry, I thought this had been updated!

-- 
Félix

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python

csiph-web