Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #12519

Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning

From Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning
Date 2020-04-24 03:20 +0200
Message-ID <zYVax-YT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <zYRJD-7f9-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <zYS30-7mT-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <zYUo9-tN-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <zYURb-Dt-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 20-04-23 20 h 52, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> 
> 
> On April 24, 2020 12:26:27 AM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau" <pollo@debian.org> wrote:
>> On 20-04-23 17 h 54, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> On Thursday, April 23, 2020 5:21:49 PM EDT Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
>>>> This warning was added to Lintian today, after being requested in
>>>> #958182.  It appears on thousands of packages:
>>>>
>> https://lintian.debian.org/tags/mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructu
>>>> re.html
>>>
>>> Thanks.  I mailed the bug to point out this tag is currently
>> problematic.
>>
>> FWIW, I proposed we merge the DPMT and the PAPT a few months ago [1]
>> and
>> migrate to team+python@tracker.debian.org.
>>
>> That would also solve the current issue with lintian :)
>>
>> [1]:
>> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/-/merge_requests/10
> 
> And I don't think the response was particularly positive.  My recollection was that there's a preference for two teams because packages and modules have different needs.

Hmm, from the discussions we had on the mailing list and on Salsa the
feedback was mainly positive actually.

Happy to talk some more about it either on Salsa or on the ML:

https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/10/msg00021.html

> 
> I don't think we should let an artificial sense of urgency because lintian push us in to anything (apologies if I'm remembering the wrong instance of this being suggested - it's happened before).

Agreed :)

Sorry for disrupting this thread.

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org
  ⠈⠳⣄

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org> - 2020-04-23 19:00 +0200
  Re: khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2020-04-23 19:10 +0200
    Re: khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-23 19:10 +0200
      Re: khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-04-23 19:20 +0200
      Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com> - 2020-04-23 23:40 +0200
        Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-04-24 00:00 +0200
          Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2020-04-24 02:30 +0200
            Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2020-04-24 03:00 +0200
              Re: mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2020-04-24 03:20 +0200
    Re: khard_0.16.1-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Félix Sipma <felix+debian@gueux.org> - 2020-04-23 19:10 +0200

csiph-web